389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29180173)
1. Greater lymph node retrieval and lymph node ratio impacts survival in resected pancreatic cancer.
Mirkin KA; Hollenbeak CS; Wong J
J Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 220():12-24. PubMed ID: 29180173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Number of Examined Lymph Nodes and Nodal Status Assessment in Distal Pancreatectomy for Body/Tail Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Malleo G; Maggino L; Ferrone CR; Marchegiani G; Mino-Kenudson M; Capelli P; Rusev B; Lillemoe KD; Bassi C; Fernàndez-Del Castillo C; Salvia R
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 29672406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer.
Riediger H; Keck T; Wellner U; zur Hausen A; Adam U; Hopt UT; Makowiec F
J Gastrointest Surg; 2009 Jul; 13(7):1337-44. PubMed ID: 19418101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis.
Slidell MB; Chang DC; Cameron JL; Wolfgang C; Herman JM; Schulick RD; Choti MA; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 17896141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Para-aortic node involvement is not an independent predictor of survival after resection for pancreatic cancer.
Sperti C; Gruppo M; Blandamura S; Valmasoni M; Pozza G; Passuello N; Beltrame V; Moletta L
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jun; 23(24):4399-4406. PubMed ID: 28706422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.
Pawlik TM; Gleisner AL; Cameron JL; Winter JM; Assumpcao L; Lillemoe KD; Wolfgang C; Hruban RH; Schulick RD; Yeo CJ; Choti MA
Surgery; 2007 May; 141(5):610-8. PubMed ID: 17462460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nodal counts and lymph node ratio impact survival after distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Ashfaq A; Pockaj BA; Gray RJ; Halfdanarson TR; Wasif N
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Nov; 18(11):1929-35. PubMed ID: 24916590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor after resection of periampullary malignancies: data from a tertiary referral center in the middle East.
Shamseddine AI; Mukherji D; Melki C; Elias E; Eloubeidi M; Dimassi H; Khalife M; Abou-Alfa G; O'Reilly E; Faraj W
Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Feb; 37(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 23111358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: number of positive nodes allows to distinguish several N categories.
Strobel O; Hinz U; Gluth A; Hank T; Hackert T; Bergmann F; Werner J; Büchler MW
Ann Surg; 2015 May; 261(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 24979603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic impact of lymph node status in patients after total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A strobe-compliant study.
Zheng ZJ; Wang MJ; Tan CL; Chen YH; Ping J; Liu XB
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Feb; 99(8):e19327. PubMed ID: 32080152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significance of Examined Lymph Node Number in Accurate Staging and Long-term Survival in Resected Stage I-II Pancreatic Cancer-More is Better? A Large International Population-based Cohort Study.
Huang L; Jansen L; Balavarca Y; van der Geest L; Lemmens V; Koerkamp BG; van Santvoort HC; Grützmann R; Besselink MG; Schrotz-King P; Brenner H
Ann Surg; 2021 Dec; 274(6):e554-e563. PubMed ID: 31425290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymph node ratio as parameter of regional lymph node involvement in pancreatic cancer.
Yamada S; Fujii T; Hirakawa A; Kanda M; Sugimoto H; Kodera Y
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 Dec; 401(8):1143-1152. PubMed ID: 27048402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Berger AC; Watson JC; Ross EA; Hoffman JP
Am Surg; 2004 Mar; 70(3):235-40; discussion 240. PubMed ID: 15055847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revisiting the concept of lymph node metastases of pancreatic head cancer: number of metastatic lymph nodes and lymph node ratio according to N stage.
Kang MJ; Jang JY; Chang YR; Kwon W; Jung W; Kim SW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 21(5):1545-51. PubMed ID: 24419758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymph node ratio versus number of affected lymph nodes as predictors of survival for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Bhatti I; Peacock O; Awan AK; Semeraro D; Larvin M; Hall RI
World J Surg; 2010 Apr; 34(4):768-75. PubMed ID: 20052471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio and number of resected nodes after curative resection of ampulla of Vater carcinoma.
Falconi M; Crippa S; Domínguez I; Barugola G; Capelli P; Marcucci S; Beghelli S; Scarpa A; Bassi C; Pederzoli P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):3178-86. PubMed ID: 18712568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the number of positive lymph nodes and lymph node ratio on prognosis of patients after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Liu ZQ; Xiao ZW; Luo GP; Liu L; Liu C; Xu J; Long J; Ni QX; Yu XJ
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2014 Dec; 13(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 25475867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The relationship between the index of lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients after R0 resection].
Ren H; Wang CF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 42(6):474-479. PubMed ID: 32575943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Number of lymph nodes evaluated: prognostic value in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Huebner M; Kendrick M; Reid-Lombardo KM; Que F; Therneau T; Qin R; Donohue J; Nagorney D; Farnell M; Sarr M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):920-6. PubMed ID: 22421988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of the lymph node ratio in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Impact on patient stratification and prognosis.
La Torre M; Cavallini M; Ramacciato G; Cosenza G; Rossi Del Monte S; Nigri G; Ferri M; Mercantini P; Ziparo V
J Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 104(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 21713779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
