92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2918068)
1. Recovery of motile sperm using the migration-sedimentation technique in an in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programme.
Lucena E; Lucena C; Gómez M; Ortiz JA; Ruiz J; Arango A; Diaz C; Beuerman C
Hum Reprod; 1989 Feb; 4(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 2918068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Migration sedimentation technique as a predictive test for the fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa in an in-vitro fertilization programme.
Hauser R; Homonnai ZT; Paz GF; Yavetz H; Amit A; Lessing JB; Peyser MR; Yogev L
Int J Androl; 1992 Dec; 15(6):498-503. PubMed ID: 1483739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A self-migration method for preparation of sperm for in-vitro fertilization.
Wikland M; Wik O; Steen Y; Qvist K; Söderlund B; Janson PO
Hum Reprod; 1987 Apr; 2(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 3597738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a cut-off value for sperm motility after different hours of incubation to select the suitable reproductive technology (IVF or ICSI).
Zollner U; Martin S; Liebermann J; Steck T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Apr; 78(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 10203301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Techniques of sperm selection and in vitro fertilization results.
Leonetti T; Causio F; Cagnazzo G
Acta Eur Fertil; 1995; 26(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8923915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphology of seminal and swim-up spermatozoa and the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Rosenborg L; Gustafson O; Lunell NO; Nylund L; Pousette A; Slotte H; Akerlöf E; Fredricsson B
Andrologia; 1990; 22(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 2264633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Separation of spermatozoa using Percoll gradients: value for in vitro fertilization].
Mathieu C; Guérin JF; Gille Y; Pinatel MC; Lornage J; Boulieu D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 3385161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Separation of sperm cells by sedimentation technique is not suitable for in vitro fertilization purposes.
Yavetz H; Hauser R; Homonnai ZT; Paz GF; Lessing JB; Amit A; Yogev I
Andrologia; 1996; 28(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8659712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Problems related to the laboratory part of treatment by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Leroy F; Puissant F; Camus M; Englert Y
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1987; 45(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 3310758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of abnormal structure of sperm chromatin on the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer].
GU LJ; CHEN ZW; LU WH; XU JF; LI M; CHEN ZJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 28(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 21462126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-vitro fertilization in cases with severe sperm defect: use of a swim-across technique and medium supplemented with follicular fluid.
Giorgetti C; Hans E; Spach JL; Auquier P; Roulier R
Hum Reprod; 1992 Sep; 7(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 1400937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of severe male-factor infertility with high concentrations of motile sperm by microinsemination in embryo cryopreservation straws.
Hammitt DG; Walker DL; Syrop CH; Miller TM; Bennett MR
J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1991 Apr; 8(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 2061678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motility, acrosome integrity, membrane integrity and oocyte cleavage rate of sperm separated by swim-up or Percoll gradient method from frozen-thawed buffalo semen.
Mehmood A; Anwar M; Naqvi SM
Anim Reprod Sci; 2009 Apr; 111(2-4):141-8. PubMed ID: 18378413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two techniques used to collect normal and motile sperm.
Szerman-Joly E; Sauvalle A; Izard J; Drosdowsky M
Int J Androl; 1989 Jun; 12(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 2767781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pregnancy after direct oocyte-sperm transfer (DOST)--a simple alternative to in vitro fertilization (IVF)].
Sterzik K; Rosenbusch B; Grab D; Lauritzen C
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Sep; 51(9):685-7. PubMed ID: 1743467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Male factor as determinant of in-vitro fertilization outcome.
Enginsu ME; Pieters MH; Dumoulin JC; Evers JL; Geraedts JP
Hum Reprod; 1992 Sep; 7(8):1136-40. PubMed ID: 1400938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative evaluation of migration sedimentation method for sperm preparation.
Kiratli S; Yuncu M; Kose K; Ozkavukcu S
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2018 Apr; 64(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 29157008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sperm morphology and IVF pregnancy rate: comparison between Percoll gradient centrifugation and swim-up procedures.
Van der Zwalmen P; Bertin-Segal G; Geerts L; Debauche C; Schoysman R
Hum Reprod; 1991 Apr; 6(4):581-8. PubMed ID: 1918311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of cryopreservation on quality and fertilization capacity of human sperm.
Marcus-Braun N; Braun G; Potashnik G; Har-Vardi I
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Sep; 116(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 15294370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Congenital absence of the vas deferens. The fertilizing capacity of human epididymal sperm.
Silber SJ; Ord T; Balmaceda J; Patrizio P; Asch RH
N Engl J Med; 1990 Dec; 323(26):1788-92. PubMed ID: 2247117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
