138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29180756)
1. Asymmetrical bipolar nanosecond electric pulse widths modify bipolar cancellation.
Valdez CM; Barnes RA; Roth CC; Moen EK; Throckmorton GA; Ibey BL
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16372. PubMed ID: 29180756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The interphase interval within a bipolar nanosecond electric pulse modulates bipolar cancellation.
Valdez CM; Barnes R; Roth CC; Moen E; Ibey B
Bioelectromagnetics; 2018 Sep; 39(6):441-450. PubMed ID: 29984850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of asymmetrical bipolar pulses and interphase intervals on the bipolar cancellation phenomenon in the ovarian cancer cell line.
Łapińska Z; Novickij V; Rembiałkowska N; Szewczyk A; Dubińska-Magiera M; Kulbacka J; Saczko J
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Oct; 153():108483. PubMed ID: 37301162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.
Pakhomov AG; Grigoryev S; Semenov I; Casciola M; Jiang C; Xiao S
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Aug; 122():123-133. PubMed ID: 29627664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electropermeabilization by uni- or bipolar nanosecond electric pulses: The impact of extracellular conductivity.
Gianulis EC; Casciola M; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Pakhomov AG
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Feb; 119():10-19. PubMed ID: 28865240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective distant electrostimulation by synchronized bipolar nanosecond pulses.
Gianulis EC; Casciola M; Zhou C; Yang E; Xiao S; Pakhomov AG
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13116. PubMed ID: 31511591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interference targeting of bipolar nanosecond electric pulses for spatially focused electroporation, electrostimulation, and tissue ablation.
Pakhomov AG; Gudvangen E; Xiao S; Semenov I
Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Oct; 141():107876. PubMed ID: 34171507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.
Pakhomov AG; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Gregory B; Schoenbach KH; Ullery JC; Beier HT; Rajulapati SR; Ibey BL
Cell Mol Life Sci; 2014 Nov; 71(22):4431-41. PubMed ID: 24748074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Action spectra and mechanisms of (in) efficiency of bipolar electric pulses at electroporation.
Kim V; Semenov I; Kiester AS; Keppler MA; Ibey BL; Bixler JN; Pakhomov AG
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Feb; 149():108319. PubMed ID: 36375440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Next generation CANCAN focusing for remote stimulation by nanosecond electric pulses.
Pakhomov AG; Gudvangen E; Mangalanathan U; Kondratiev O; Redondo L; Semenov I
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Aug; 152():108437. PubMed ID: 37030093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 2-ns Electrostimulation of Ca
Zaklit J; Craviso GL; Leblanc N; Vernier PT; Sözer EB
Biophys J; 2021 Feb; 120(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 33359835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.
Pakhomov AG; Gianulis E; Vernier PT; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Apr; 1848(4):958-66. PubMed ID: 25585279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of Pressure Transients Generated by Nanosecond Electrical Pulse (nsEP) Exposure.
Roth CC; Barnes RA; Ibey BL; Beier HT; Christopher Mimun L; Maswadi SM; Shadaram M; Glickman RD
Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15063. PubMed ID: 26450165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimulation or Cancellation of Ca
Bagalkot TR; Leblanc N; Craviso GL
Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11545. PubMed ID: 31395918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.
Pakhomov AG; Pakhomova ON
Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Dec; 136():107598. PubMed ID: 32711366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulation of biological responses to 2 ns electrical stimuli by field reversal.
Sözer EB; Vernier PT
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2019 Jun; 1861(6):1228-1239. PubMed ID: 30981731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probe beam deflection optical imaging of thermal and mechanical phenomena resulting from nanosecond electric pulse (nsEP) exposure in-vitro.
Barnes RA; Roth CC; Beier HT; Noojin G; Valdez C; Bixler J; Moen E; Shadaram M; Ibey BL
Opt Express; 2017 Mar; 25(6):6621-6643. PubMed ID: 28381008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nanosecond bipolar pulse generators for bioelectrics.
Xiao S; Zhou C; Yang E; Rajulapati SR
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Oct; 123():77-87. PubMed ID: 29729643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sub-MHz bursts of nanosecond pulses excite neurons at paradoxically low electric field thresholds without membrane damage.
Silkunas M; Gudvangen E; Novickij V; Pakhomov AG
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2022 Nov; 1864(11):184034. PubMed ID: 35981654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Plasma membrane permeabilization by 60- and 600-ns electric pulses is determined by the absorbed dose.
Ibey BL; Xiao S; Schoenbach KH; Murphy MR; Pakhomov AG
Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Feb; 30(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 18839412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]