These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29181446)

  • 1. Discrete False-Discovery Rate Improves Identification of Differentially Abundant Microbes.
    Jiang L; Amir A; Morton JT; Heller R; Arias-Castro E; Knight R
    mSystems; 2017; 2(6):. PubMed ID: 29181446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating Phylogenetic Information in Microbiome Differential Abundance Studies Has No Effect on Detection Power and FDR Control.
    Bichat A; Plassais J; Ambroise C; Mariadassou M
    Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():649. PubMed ID: 32351481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bon-EV: an improved multiple testing procedure for controlling false discovery rates.
    Li D; Xie Z; Zand M; Fogg T; Dye T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SOME STEP-DOWN PROCEDURES CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE UNDER DEPENDENCE.
    Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP
    Stat Sin; 2008; 18(3):881-904. PubMed ID: 19018297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A two-stage microbial association mapping framework with advanced FDR control.
    Hu J; Koh H; He L; Liu M; Blaser MJ; Li H
    Microbiome; 2018 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 30045760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using alpha wisely: improving power to detect multiple QTL.
    Simonsen KL; McIntyre LM
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article1. PubMed ID: 16646787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments.
    Pawluk-Kołc M; Zieba-Palus J; Parczewski A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 160(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16221535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A weighted FDR procedure under discrete and heterogeneous null distributions.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Sarkar SK
    Biom J; 2020 Oct; 62(6):1544-1563. PubMed ID: 32367597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modifying the false discovery rate procedure based on the information theory under arbitrary correlation structure and its performance in high-dimensional genomic data.
    Rastaghi S; Saki A; Tabesh H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):57. PubMed ID: 38317067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure.
    Green GH; Diggle PJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article27. PubMed ID: 18052910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD; Xu H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Ann Stat; 2011 Feb; 39(1):556-583. PubMed ID: 25018568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Heyse JF
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):761-779. PubMed ID: 29748972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LOCOM: A logistic regression model for testing differential abundance in compositional microbiome data with false discovery rate control.
    Hu Y; Satten GA; Hu YJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(30):e2122788119. PubMed ID: 35867822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compositional knockoff filter for high-dimensional regression analysis of microbiome data.
    Srinivasan A; Xue L; Zhan X
    Biometrics; 2021 Sep; 77(3):984-995. PubMed ID: 32683674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Adaptive Multivariate Two-Sample Test With Application to Microbiome Differential Abundance Analysis.
    Banerjee K; Zhao N; Srinivasan A; Xue L; Hicks SD; Middleton FA; Wu R; Zhan X
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():350. PubMed ID: 31068967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dependence in high-dimensional multiple testing problems.
    Kim KI; van de Wiel MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():114. PubMed ID: 18298808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel approach to minimize false discovery rate in genome-wide data analysis.
    Bei Y; Hong P
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S1. PubMed ID: 24564975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.