196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29181514)
1. Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts.
Inoue LYT; Lin DW; Newcomb LF; Leonardson AS; Ankerst D; Gulati R; Carter HB; Trock BJ; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Klotz LH; Mamedov A; Penson DF; Etzioni R
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jan; 168(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29181514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer mortality and metastasis under different biopsy frequencies in North American active surveillance cohorts.
Lange JM; Laviana AA; Penson DF; Lin DW; Bill-Axelson A; Carlsson SV; Newcomb LF; Trock BJ; Carter HB; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Klotz LH; Etzioni RB
Cancer; 2020 Feb; 126(3):583-592. PubMed ID: 31639200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Tomer A; Nieboer D; Roobol MJ; Bjartell A; Steyerberg EW; Rizopoulos D;
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 32531869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts.
Drost FH; Nieboer D; Morgan TM; Carroll PR; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 31451332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of pathologic progression on biopsy among men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: the value of the pattern of surveillance biopsies.
Cary KC; Cowan JE; Sanford M; Shinohara K; Perez N; Chan JM; Meng MV; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 24035632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.
Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; Rannikko A; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Kakehi Y; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):814-21. PubMed ID: 26138043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate volume effect on Gleason score upgrading in active surveillance appropriate patients.
Çamur E; Coşkun A; Kavukoğlu Ӧ; Can U; Kara Ö; Develi Çamur A; Sarıca K; Narter KF
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jul; 91(2):. PubMed ID: 31266273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Kornberg Z; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Cooperberg MR; Chan JM; Zhao S; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):300-307. PubMed ID: 30179620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tailoring Intensity of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Individualized Prediction of Risk Stability.
Cooperberg MR; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Zhu K; Cowan JE; Brooks JD; Dash A; Gleave ME; Martin F; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Carroll PR; Lin DW
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):e203187. PubMed ID: 32852532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason Upgrading with Time in a Large Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort.
Jain S; Loblaw A; Vesprini D; Zhang L; Kattan MW; Mamedov A; Jethava V; Sethukavalan P; Yu C; Klotz L
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 25660208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Upgrading on Per Protocol versus For Cause surveillance prostate biopsies: An opportunity to decreasing the burden of active surveillance.
Wang M; Lange A; Perlman D; Qi J; George AK; Ferrante S; Semerjian A; Sarle R; Cher ML; Ginsburg KB;
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(12):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 37173808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing active surveillance strategies to balance the competing goals of early detection of grade progression and minimizing harm from biopsies.
Barnett CL; Auffenberg GB; Cheng Z; Yang F; Wang J; Wei JT; Miller DC; Montie JE; Mamawala M; Denton BT
Cancer; 2018 Feb; 124(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 29131319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age is Associated with Upgrading at Confirmatory Biopsy among Men with Prostate Cancer Treated with Active Surveillance.
Anderson CB; Sternberg IA; Karen-Paz G; Kim PH; Sjoberg D; Vargas HA; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Ehdaie B
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1607-11. PubMed ID: 26119671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Indications for intervention during active surveillance of prostate cancer: a comparison of the Johns Hopkins and Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocols.
Kates M; Tosoian JJ; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Carter HB; Partin AW
BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 24904995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of Active Surveillance after Initial Surveillance Prostate Biopsy.
Kovac E; Lieser G; Elshafei A; Jones JS; Klein EA; Stephenson AJ
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 27449260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of Surveillance Biopsy with No Cancer as a Prognostic Marker for Reclassification: Results from the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.
Kearns JT; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Dash A; Ellis WJ; Fabrizio M; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Zheng Y; Lin DW
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):706-712. PubMed ID: 29433973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
