192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29182131)
1. Lateral pinning versus others procedures in the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children.
Begovic N; Paunovic Z; Djuraskovic Z; Lazovic L; Mijovic T; Babic S
Acta Orthop Belg; 2016 Dec; 82(4):866-871. PubMed ID: 29182131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after the surgical treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus: number needed to harm, a systematic review.
Slobogean BL; Jackman H; Tennant S; Slobogean GP; Mulpuri K
J Pediatr Orthop; 2010; 30(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 20574258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of displaced pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture patterns requiring medial fixation: a reliable and safer cross-pinning technique.
Edmonds EW; Roocroft JH; Mubarak SJ
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Jun; 32(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 22584833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compared outcomes after percutaneous pinning versus open reduction in paediatric supracondylar elbow fractures.
Yaokreh JB; Gicquel P; Schneider L; Stanchina C; Karger C; Saliba E; Ossenou O; Clavert JM
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 98(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 22981702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of lateral entry and crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao H; Xu S; Liu G; Zhao J; Wu S; Peng L
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jun; 16(1):366. PubMed ID: 34107972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.
Maity A; Saha D; Roy DS
J Orthop Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 7():6. PubMed ID: 22335830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sliding the Medial Pin: A Safer Approach to Cross-pinning Humerus Supracondylar Fractures?
Wong KPL; Chew EM; Mahadev A
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg; 2019 Sep; 23(3):111-114. PubMed ID: 30664066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures among children: crossed versus lateral pinning.
Zamzam MM; Bakarman KA
Injury; 2009 Jun; 40(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 19394928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Results of Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning for Gartland Type II Flexion-Type Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children: Report of Three Cases.
Tomori Y; Nanno M; Majima T
J Nippon Med Sch; 2023; 90(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 37380478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ipsilateral supracondylar fracture and forearm bone injury in children: a retrospective review of thirty one cases.
Dhoju D; Shrestha D; Parajuli N; Dhakal G; Shrestha R
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2011; 9(34):11-6. PubMed ID: 22610861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning of a Pediatric Supracondylar Distal Humerus Fracture.
Dineen HA; Stone J; Ostrum RF
J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Aug; 33 Suppl 1():S7-S8. PubMed ID: 31290818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medial and lateral crossed pinning versus lateral pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: decision analysis.
Lee KM; Chung CY; Gwon DK; Sung KH; Kim TW; Choi IH; Cho TJ; Yoo WJ; Park MS
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Mar; 32(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 22327446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The posterior intrafocal pin improves sagittal alignment in Gartland type III paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.
Kao HK; Lee WC; Yang WE; Chang CH
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):842-7. PubMed ID: 26777466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Type II Lateral Condyle Humerus Fractures in Children Displaced >2 mm.
Pennock AT; Salgueiro L; Upasani VV; Bastrom TP; Newton PO; Yaszay B
J Pediatr Orthop; 2016 Dec; 36(8):780-786. PubMed ID: 26090985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical results of closed versus mini-open reduction with percutaneous pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: A retrospective case-control study.
Tomori Y; Nanno M; Takai S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(45):e13162. PubMed ID: 30407346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical management of delayed Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fractures in children: A retrospective comparison of radial external fixator and crossed pinning.
Li J; Rai S; Tang X; Ze R; Liu R; Hong P
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(10):e19449. PubMed ID: 32150100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Traumatic and iatrogenic neurological complications after supracondylar humerus fractures in children.
Brown IC; Zinar DM
J Pediatr Orthop; 1995; 15(4):440-3. PubMed ID: 7560030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open or closed pinning for distal humerus fractures in children?
de Buys Roessingh AS; Reinberg O
Swiss Surg; 2003; 9(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 12723287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nerve injuries in supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: is nerve exploration indicated?
Khademolhosseini M; Abd Rashid AH; Ibrahim S
J Pediatr Orthop B; 2013 Mar; 22(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 23222035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for type III displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.
Cheng JC; Lam TP; Shen WY
J Orthop Trauma; 1995; 9(6):511-5. PubMed ID: 8592265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
