These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29182154)
1. An automated, quantitative, and case-specific evaluation of deformable image registration in computed tomography images. Kierkels RGJ; den Otter LA; Korevaar EW; Langendijk JA; van der Schaaf A; Knopf AC; Sijtsema NM Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045026. PubMed ID: 29182154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The distance discordance metric-a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra- and inter-patient deformable image registration. Saleh ZH; Apte AP; Sharp GC; Shusharina NP; Wang Y; Veeraraghavan H; Thor M; Muren LP; Rao SS; Lee NY; Deasy JO Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(3):733-46. PubMed ID: 24440838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multiple-image-based method to evaluate the performance of deformable image registration in the pelvis. Saleh Z; Thor M; Apte AP; Sharp G; Tang X; Veeraraghavan H; Muren L; Deasy J Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):6172-80. PubMed ID: 27469495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A framework for deformable image registration validation in radiotherapy clinical applications. Varadhan R; Karangelis G; Krishnan K; Hui S J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):4066. PubMed ID: 23318394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Uncertainties in dose warping due to the choice of deformable registration algorithm. Veiga C; Lourenço AM; Mouinuddin S; van Herk M; Modat M; Ourselin S; Royle G; McClelland JR Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):760-9. PubMed ID: 25652490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Representing the dosimetric impact of deformable image registration errors. Vickress J; Battista J; Barnett R; Yartsev S Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):N391-N403. PubMed ID: 28800299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Voxel-based statistical analysis of uncertainties associated with deformable image registration. Li S; Glide-Hurst C; Lu M; Kim J; Wen N; Adams JN; Gordon J; Chetty IJ; Zhong H Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6481-94. PubMed ID: 24002435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive evaluation of ten deformable image registration algorithms for contour propagation between CT and cone-beam CT images in adaptive head & neck radiotherapy. Li X; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wu S; Xiao Y; Gu X; Zhen X; Zhou L PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175906. PubMed ID: 28414799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multivariable study of deformable image registration evaluation metrics in 4DCT of thoracic cancer patients. Juan-Cruz C; Fast MF; Sonke JJ Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 66(3):035019. PubMed ID: 33227717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of deformable image registration for contour propagation between CT and cone-beam CT images in adaptive head and neck radiotherapy. Li X; Zhang YY; Shi YH; Zhou LH; Zhen X Technol Health Care; 2016 Apr; 24 Suppl 2():S747-55. PubMed ID: 27259084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A neural network approach for fast, automated quantification of DIR performance. Neylon J; Min Y; Low DA; Santhanam A Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4126-4138. PubMed ID: 28477340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A virtual phantom library for the quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties in patients with cancers of the head and neck. Pukala J; Meeks SL; Staton RJ; Bova FJ; Mañon RR; Langen KM Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111703. PubMed ID: 24320411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the dosimetric effect and reduction of inverse consistency and transitivity errors in deformable image registration for dose accumulation. Bender ET; Hardcastle N; Tomé WA Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):272-80. PubMed ID: 22225297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated, reference-free local error assessment of multimodal deformable image registration for radiotherapy in the head and neck. Nix MG; Prestwich RJD; Speight R Radiother Oncol; 2017 Dec; 125(3):478-484. PubMed ID: 29100697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a DVH overlay technique for quality assurance of deformable image registration-based dose accumulation. Kainz K; Garcia Alvarez J; Zhong H; Lim S; Ahunbay E; Tai A; Erickson B; Lawton C; Li XA Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):611-623. PubMed ID: 34826153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy. Broggi S; Scalco E; Belli ML; Logghe G; Verellen D; Moriconi S; Chiara A; Palmisano A; Mellone R; Fiorino C; Rizzo G Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 16(3):373-381. PubMed ID: 28168934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The level of detail required in a deformable phantom to accurately perform quality assurance of deformable image registration. Saenz DL; Kim H; Chen J; Stathakis S; Kirby N Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6269-80. PubMed ID: 27494827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of computed tomography image characteristics and knot spacing on the spatial accuracy of B-spline deformable image registration in the head and neck geometry. Brouwer CL; Kierkels RG; van 't Veld AA; Sijtsema NM; Meertens H Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():169. PubMed ID: 25074293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assurance assessment of diagnostic and radiation therapy-simulation CT image registration for head and neck radiation therapy: anatomic region of interest-based comparison of rigid and deformable algorithms. Mohamed AS; Ruangskul MN; Awan MJ; Baron CA; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Castillo R; Castillo E; Guerrero TM; Kocak-Uzel E; Yang J; Court LE; Kantor ME; Gunn GB; Colen RR; Frank SJ; Garden AS; Rosenthal DI; Fuller CD Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):752-63. PubMed ID: 25380454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]