These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29182915)

  • 21. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Bertoli S; Bodmer D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 24216383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Oates PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automatic and attentive processing of sounds in cochlear implant patients - electrophysiological evidence.
    Nager W; Münte TF; Bohrer I; Lenarz T; Dengler R; Möbes J; Schröder C; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):391-6. PubMed ID: 17943014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Study of Event-Related Potentials During Monaural and Bilateral Hearing in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
    Voola M; Nguyen AT; Wedekind A; Marinovic W; Rajan G; Tavora-Vieira D
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):842-853. PubMed ID: 36706105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):159-173. PubMed ID: 28067750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enhanced audio-visual interactions in the auditory cortex of elderly cochlear-implant users.
    Schierholz I; Finke M; Schulte S; Hauthal N; Kantzke C; Rach S; Büchner A; Dengler R; Sandmann P
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():133-47. PubMed ID: 26302946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cochlear implant effectiveness in postlingual single-sided deaf individuals: what's the point?
    Finke M; Bönitz H; Lyxell B; Illg A
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):417-423. PubMed ID: 28635507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A direct comparison of voice pitch processing in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Steinmetzger K; Meinhardt B; Praetorius M; Andermann M; Rupp A
    Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 36():103188. PubMed ID: 36113196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Having Two Ears Facilitates the Perceptual Separation of Concurrent Talkers for Bilateral and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implantees.
    Bernstein JG; Goupell MJ; Schuchman GI; Rivera AL; Brungart DS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 26886027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Event-Related Potentials of Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users: Using a Semantic Oddball Paradigm in Noise.
    Voola M; Wedekind A; Nguyen AT; Marinovic W; Rajan G; Tavora-Vieira D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):280-293. PubMed ID: 36940674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Literature overview on P3 measurement as an objective measure of auditory performance in post-lingually deaf adults with a cochlear implant.
    Jacquemin L; Mertens G; Schlee W; Van de Heyning P; Gilles A
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):816-823. PubMed ID: 31441664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in unsuccessful cochlear implant users.
    Munivrana B; Mildner V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2013 Jul; 27(6-7):472-83. PubMed ID: 23621479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bilateral cochlear implants in long-term and short-term deafness.
    McNeill C; Noble W; Purdy SC; O'Brien A; Sharma M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 22340752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cortical auditory evoked responses from an implanted ear after 50 years of profound unilateral deafness.
    McNeill C; Sharma M; Purdy SC; Agung K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2007 Dec; 8(4):189-99. PubMed ID: 18033739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis.
    Debener S; Makeig S; Delorme A; Engel AK
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 15722203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.