These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29182954)

  • 1. Assessment of signature handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratio based on comparative measurement of relevant dynamic features.
    Chen XH; Champod C; Yang X; Shi SP; Luo YW; Wang N; Wang YC; Lu QM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jan; 282():101-110. PubMed ID: 29182954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extraction and analysis of the width, gray scale and radian in Chinese signature handwriting.
    Chen X
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():123-32. PubMed ID: 26209129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic characteristics of signatures: effects of writer style on genuine and simulated signatures.
    Mohammed L; Found B; Caligiuri M; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25420668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic feature analysis of handwritten electronic signatures based on Fourier transform.
    Yang Y; Han X; Qin D
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):264-272. PubMed ID: 37753810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SynSig2Vec: Forgery-Free Learning of Dynamic Signature Representations by Sigma Lognormal-Based Synthesis and 1D CNN.
    Lai S; Jin L; Zhu Y; Li Z; Lin L
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2022 Oct; 44(10):6472-6485. PubMed ID: 34101587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Score-based likelihood ratios for handwriting evidence.
    Hepler AB; Saunders CP; Davis LJ; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):129-40. PubMed ID: 22297142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Behavioral Handwriting Model for Static and Dynamic Signature Synthesis.
    Ferrer MA; Diaz M; Carmona-Duarte C; Morales A
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2017 Jun; 39(6):1041-1053. PubMed ID: 27333600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Signatures as an object of autoforgery (self-forgery).
    Koziczak A
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2024; 73(3):257-271. PubMed ID: 38662467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using subsampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratios.
    Davis LJ; Saunders CP; Hepler A; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22018850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic signatures: A review of dynamic feature variation and forensic methodology.
    Linden J; Marquis R; Bozza S; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():216-229. PubMed ID: 30241096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inkjet classification based on a few letters.
    Chen XH; Yang X; Luo YW; Zhang QH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110869. PubMed ID: 34147939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of time on dynamic signature: An exploratory data analysis.
    Linden J; Marquis R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111577. PubMed ID: 37148783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online handwritten signature verification using neural network classifier based on principal component analysis.
    Iranmanesh V; Ahmad SM; Adnan WA; Yussof S; Arigbabu OA; Malallah FL
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():381469. PubMed ID: 25133227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic Analysis of Digital Dynamic Signatures: New Methods for Data Treatment and Feature Evaluation.
    Linden J; Marquis R; Mazzella W
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):382-391. PubMed ID: 27859241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dynamic character of disguise behavior for text-based, mixed, and stylized signatures.
    Mohammed LA; Found B; Caligiuri M; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S136-41. PubMed ID: 20950317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are expert penmen better than lay people at producing simulations of a model signature?
    Dewhurst T; Found B; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Aug; 180(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 18703294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early attentive processing on forged and genuine exemplars by imitators: An ERP study.
    Guo W; Jia Z
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():335-341. PubMed ID: 30852417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmarking desktop and mobile handwriting across COTS devices: The e-BioSign biometric database.
    Tolosana R; Vera-Rodriguez R; Fierrez J; Morales A; Ortega-Garcia J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176792. PubMed ID: 28475590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online signature verification and recognition: an approach based on symbolic representation.
    Guru DS; Prakash HN
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 Jun; 31(6):1059-73. PubMed ID: 19372610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of the likelihood ratio for evaluative and investigative purposes in comparative forensic handwriting examination.
    Taroni F; Marquis R; Schmittbuhl M; Biedermann A; Thiéry A; Bozza S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):189-94. PubMed ID: 21907508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.