These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29183377)

  • 1. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
    Quan EM; Liu W; Wu R; Li Y; Frank SJ; Zhang X; Zhu XR; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709. PubMed ID: 23927306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
    Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
    Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
    Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
    Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Including anatomical variations in robust optimization for head and neck proton therapy can reduce the need of adaptation.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 Feb; 131():127-134. PubMed ID: 30773179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
    Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical implementation in proton therapy of multi-field optimization by a hybrid method combining conventional PTV with robust optimization.
    Tommasino F; Widesott L; Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Righetto R; Algranati C; Scifoni E; Dionisi F; Scartoni D; Amelio D; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M; Amichetti M; Farace P
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(4):045002. PubMed ID: 31851957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190573. PubMed ID: 31778315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
    Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The partial adaptation strategy for online-adaptive proton therapy: A proof of concept study in head and neck cancer patients.
    Gambetta V; Fredriksson A; Menkel S; Richter C; Stützer K
    Med Phys; 2024 Aug; 51(8):5572-5581. PubMed ID: 38837396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
    Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
    Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
    Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
    Bai X; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025004. PubMed ID: 30523932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers.
    Yang Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhu XR; Gunn B; Frank SJ; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Liao L; Li Y; Chen M; Li H
    Radiother Oncol; 2020 Jan; 142():124-132. PubMed ID: 31564553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential proton and photon dose degradation in advanced head and neck cancer patients by intratherapy changes.
    Stützer K; Jakobi A; Bandurska-Luque A; Barczyk S; Arnsmeyer C; Löck S; Richter C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):104-113. PubMed ID: 28921843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.