These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29183531)

  • 21. Onlay with Adhesive Use Compared with Sublay Mesh Placement in Ventral Hernia Repair: Was Chevrel Right? An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis.
    Haskins IN; Voeller GR; Stoikes NF; Webb DL; Chandler RG; Phillips S; Poulose BK; Rosen MJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 May; 224(5):962-970. PubMed ID: 28161483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients and contaminated fields using a single mesh: proportional meta-analysis.
    Morales-Conde S; Hernández-Granados P; Tallón-Aguilar L; Verdaguer-Tremolosa M; López-Cano M
    Hernia; 2022 Dec; 26(6):1459-1471. PubMed ID: 36098869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair.
    Liang MK; Berger RL; Nguyen MT; Hicks SC; Li LT; Leong M
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Oct; 15(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 25215466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Synthetic and Biologic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair Using Components Separation Technique.
    Sandvall BK; Suver DW; Said HK; Mathes DW; Neligan PC; Dellinger EP; Louie O
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76(6):674-9. PubMed ID: 25003419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retro-rectus placement of bio-absorbable mesh improves patient outcomes.
    Cho JE; Helm MC; Helm JH; Mier N; Kastenmeier AS; Gould JC; Goldblatt MI
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2629-2634. PubMed ID: 30361969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs.
    Berger RL; Li LT; Hicks SC; Liang MK
    J Surg Res; 2014 Dec; 192(2):426-31. PubMed ID: 24980854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Repair of recurrent hernia after biologic mesh failure in abdominal wall reconstruction.
    Purnell CA; Souza JM; Park E; Dumanian GA
    Am J Surg; 2014 Nov; 208(5):788-793. PubMed ID: 25118163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of synthetic mesh in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair during colorectal resection: risk of infection and recurrence.
    El-Gazzaz GH; Farag SH; El-Sayd MA; Mohamed HH
    Asian J Surg; 2012 Oct; 35(4):149-53. PubMed ID: 23063087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abdominal reoperation and mesh explantation following open ventral hernia repair with mesh.
    Liang MK; Li LT; Nguyen MT; Berger RL; Hicks SC; Kao LS
    Am J Surg; 2014 Oct; 208(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 25241955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sublay versus underlay in open ventral hernia repair.
    Holihan JL; Bondre I; Askenasy EP; Greenberg JA; Keith JN; Martindale RG; Roth JS; Liang MK;
    J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 27083944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost of ventral hernia repair using biologic or synthetic mesh.
    Totten CF; Davenport DL; Ward ND; Roth JS
    J Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 203(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 27363656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh.
    Sugerman HJ; Kellum JM; Reines HD; DeMaria EJ; Newsome HH; Lowry JW
    Am J Surg; 1996 Jan; 171(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 8554156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Routine use of bioprosthetic mesh is not necessary: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of intra-abdominal midweight polypropylene mesh for ventral hernia repair.
    Souza JM; Dumanian GA
    Surgery; 2013 Mar; 153(3):393-9. PubMed ID: 23068089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective, multi-institutional surgical and quality-of-life outcomes comparison of heavyweight, midweight, and lightweight mesh in open ventral hernia repair.
    Groene SA; Prasad T; Lincourt AE; Augenstein VA; Sing R; Heniford BT
    Am J Surg; 2016 Dec; 212(6):1054-1062. PubMed ID: 27855958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors affecting salvage rate of infected prosthetic mesh.
    Warren JA; Love M; Cobb WS; Beffa LR; Couto FJ; Hancock BH; Morrow D; Ewing JA; Carbonell AM
    Am J Surg; 2020 Sep; 220(3):751-756. PubMed ID: 32035628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Open preperitoneal retrofascial mesh repair for multiply recurrent ventral incisional hernias.
    Novitsky YW; Porter JR; Rucho ZC; Getz SB; Pratt BL; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Sep; 203(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 16931299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing complications and cost-utilization in ventral hernia repair utilizing biologic mesh in a bridged underlay technique.
    Basta MN; Fischer JP; Kovach SJ
    Am J Surg; 2015 Apr; 209(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 25305799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of infectious complications with synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair.
    Brown RH; Subramanian A; Hwang CS; Chang S; Awad SS
    Am J Surg; 2013 Feb; 205(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 23331984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retrospective comparison of open versus laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.
    Tsuruta A; Hirai T; Nakamura M
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2014 Aug; 7(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 24775278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risk-Assessment Score and Patient Optimization as Cost Predictors for Ventral Hernia Repair.
    Saleh S; Plymale MA; Davenport DL; Roth JS
    J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Apr; 226(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 29307611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.