439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29184086)
1. Characteristic of entire corneal topography and tomography for the detection of sub-clinical keratoconus with Zernike polynomials using Pentacam.
Xu Z; Li W; Jiang J; Zhuang X; Chen W; Peng M; Wang J; Lu F; Shen M; Wang Y
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16486. PubMed ID: 29184086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel zernike application to differentiate between three-dimensional corneal thickness of normal corneas and corneas with keratoconus.
Shetty R; Matalia H; Srivatsa P; Ghosh A; Dupps WJ; Sinha Roy A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 160(3):453-462.e2. PubMed ID: 26067190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective.
Bühren J; Schäffeler T; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 24360499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles.
Bühren J; Kook D; Yoon G; Kohnen T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3424-32. PubMed ID: 20164452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of corneal measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) and Pentacam HR topographer.
Said OM; Kamal M; Tawfik S; Saif ATS
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 23(1):194. PubMed ID: 37138239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Characteristics of corneal topography in parents of keratoconus patients].
Li J; Jing LL; Du XL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 56(6):456-464. PubMed ID: 32842328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Parental Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Characteristics of Patients With Keratoconus.
Li J; Zhang BN; Jhanji V; Wang X; Li D; Du X
Am J Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 256():146-155. PubMed ID: 37567431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G
Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Corneal Tomography: Repeatability, Precision, Misalignment, Mean Elevation, and Mean Pachymetry.
Schröder S; Mäurer S; Eppig T; Seitz B; Rubly K; Langenbucher A
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jun; 43(6):709-716. PubMed ID: 29482368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subclinical keratoconus detection with three-dimensional (3-D) morphogeometric and volumetric analysis.
Toprak I; Cavas F; Velázquez JS; Alio Del Barrio JL; Alio JL
Acta Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 98(8):e933-e942. PubMed ID: 32410342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of Zernike polynomials in reconstructing raw-elevation data captured by Pentacam HR, Medmont E300 and Eye Surface Profiler.
Wei Y; Lopes BT; Eliasy A; Wu R; Fathy A; Elsheikh A; Abass A
Heliyon; 2021 Dec; 7(12):e08623. PubMed ID: 35005275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of OPD-Scan and Pentacam Parameters for Early Keratoconus Detection.
Donoso R; Rodríguez Á; Esteffan K; Lagos C; Aránguiz D; Hernández N
Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 226():235-242. PubMed ID: 33529586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-Dimensional Morphogeometric and Volumetric Characterization of Cornea in Pediatric Patients With Early Keratoconus.
Toprak I; Cavas F; Velázquez JS; Alió Del Barrio JL; Alió JL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 222():102-111. PubMed ID: 32971022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of Pentacam and OrbscanII systems for the diagnosis of keratoconus suspects].
DU XL; Chen M; Ma L; Wang XX; Xie LX
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 48(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 22800453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of different keratoconus detection indices of pentacam in paediatric eyes.
Hashem AO; Aziz BF; Wahba SS; Roshdy MM; Elawamry AI
Eye (Lond); 2023 Apr; 37(6):1130-1138. PubMed ID: 35505110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
