264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29184610)
1. Colonoscopy procedural volume increases adenoma and polyp detection rates in gastroenterologytrainees.
Qayed E; Vora R; Levy S; Bostick RM
World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Nov; 9(11):540-551. PubMed ID: 29184610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association of trainee participation with adenoma and polyp detection rates.
Qayed E; Shea L; Goebel S; Bostick RM
World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 9(5):204-210. PubMed ID: 28572874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates.
Peters SL; Hasan AG; Jacobson NB; Austin GL
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 May; 8(5):439-42. PubMed ID: 20117245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training.
Gianotti RJ; Oza SS; Tapper EB; Kothari D; Sheth SG
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2831-2837. PubMed ID: 27405989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Starting a Gastroenterology Fellowship Training Program on Quality Measures of Colonoscopy.
Elhanafi S; Chhana R; Mallawaarachchi I; Lou W; Rangel G; Fang H; Patel R; Dwivedi AK; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
South Med J; 2017 Mar; 110(3):200-206. PubMed ID: 28257545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.
Ng S; Sreenivasan AK; Pecoriello J; Liang PS
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2229-2233. PubMed ID: 31927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving trainee colonoscopy performance by investigating the withdrawal time from individual colonic segments: a single-center observational study.
Huang Y; Chen F; Xu G; Huang L; Wan R; Yang L; Chen C
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Aug; 10(8):8607-8616. PubMed ID: 34328014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopy Nurse Participation May Increase the Polyp Detection Rate by Second-Year Fellows during Screening Colonoscopies.
Kim TS; Park DI; Lee DY; Yoon JH; Park JH; Kim HJ; Cho YK; Sohn CI; Jeon WK; Kim BI; Lim JW
Gut Liver; 2012 Jul; 6(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 22844563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Shan K; Lu H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Xu L; Wang W; Hu C; Xu L
BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 May; 21(1):213. PubMed ID: 33971824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting ADR from PDR and individual adenoma-to-polyp-detection-rate ratio for screening and surveillance colonoscopies: A new approach to quality assessment.
Schramm C; Scheller I; Franklin J; Demir M; Kuetting F; Nierhoff D; Goeser T; Toex U; Steffen HM
United European Gastroenterol J; 2017 Aug; 5(5):742-749. PubMed ID: 28815039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lack of impact on polyp detection by fellow involvement during colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.
Oh YS; Collins CL; Virani S; Kim MS; Slicker JA; Jackson JL
Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Dec; 58(12):3413-21. PubMed ID: 23695869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of fellowship training level on colonoscopy quality and efficiency metrics.
Bitar H; Zia H; Bashir M; Parava P; Hanafi M; Tierney W; Madhoun M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):378-387. PubMed ID: 29679692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon.
Boroff ES; Gurudu SR; Hentz JG; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 108(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 23567353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of moderate versus deep sedation on adenoma detection rate in index average-risk screening colonoscopies.
Turse EP; Dailey FE; Bechtold ML
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Sep; 90(3):502-505. PubMed ID: 31102644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Usefulness of polyp and adenoma detection rate in the proximal and distal colon].
Choi SY; Park DI; Lee CK; Cha JM; Lee SH; Whangbo Y; Eun CS; Han DS; Lee BI; Shin JE
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jan; 63(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24463283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Fellow Participation During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rates.
Araujo JL; Jaiswal P; Ragunathan K; Arroyo-Mercado FM; Chawla GS; Li C; Kazmi W; Le A; Gupta N; Chokshi T; Klinger CA; Salim S; Mirza RM; Grossman E; Vignesh S
Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33611689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
