These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29184631)
1. Comparison of the accuracy of conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination: An invitro study. Yaghooti Khorasani MM; Ebrahimnejad H J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2017; 11(3):161-165. PubMed ID: 29184631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination. Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of digital radiography and apex locator with the conventional method in root length determination of primary teeth. Neena IE; Ananthraj A; Praveen P; Karthik V; Rani P J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 22016313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals. Mohtavipour ST; Dalili Z; Azar NG Imaging Sci Dent; 2011 Mar; 41(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 21977467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Accuracy of Apex Locator with Tactile and Conventional Radiographic Method for Working Length Determination in Primary and Permanent Teeth. Rathore K; Tandon S; Sharma M; Kalia G; Shekhawat T; Chundawat Y Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(3):235-239. PubMed ID: 32904087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Digital Radiography, Conventional Film and Self-Developing Film for Working Length Determination. Raees Sameye M; Mohammad Bahalkeh A; Izadi A; Jafaryan A Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(3):381-384. PubMed ID: 30083210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional versus digital radiography in detecting root canal type in maxillary premolars: an in vitro study. Moshfeghi M; Sajadi SS; Sajadi S; Shahbazian M J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Jan; 10(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23724205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Students' attitudes to digital radiography and measurement accuracy of two digital systems in connection with root canal treatment. Wenzel A; Kirkevang LL Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 8(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 15469443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Different Image Processing Techniques on the Measurement Accuracy of Endodontics File Length. Nikneshan S; Boroumand R; Esmaeeli N; Azadikhah A; Paknahad M J Dent (Shiraz); 2023 Sep; 24(3):335-341. PubMed ID: 37727355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination. Kqiku L; Städtler P Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics. Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars. Topaloglu-Ak A; Aykut Yetkiner A; Güniz Baksi B; Eronat C Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26147823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Contrast Inversion Enhancement on the Accuracy of Endodontic File Length Determination in Digital Radiography. Farhadi N; Shokraneh A; Mehdizadeh M J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):ZC102-5. PubMed ID: 26155552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography - assessment of visibility of file length placed in the root canal: An in vitro study. Ravi V; Lipee P; Rao CV; Lakshmikanthan L J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2012 Aug; 4(Suppl 2):S285-9. PubMed ID: 23066272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of digital noise reduction on the accuracy of endodontic file length determination. Mehdizadeh M; Khademi AA; Shokraneh A; Farhadi N Imaging Sci Dent; 2013 Sep; 43(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 24083212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ex vivo comparison of digital images with conventional radiographs for detection of simulated voids in root canal filling material. Kositbowornchai S; Hanwachirapong D; Somsopon R; Pirmsinthavee S; Sooksuntisakoonchai N Int Endod J; 2006 Apr; 39(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 16584491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Cederberg RA; Tidwell E; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 9540092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical effectiveness of basic root canal treatment after 24 months: a randomized controlled trial. Jordan RA; Holzner AL; Markovic L; Brueckner I; Zimmer S J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 24666893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endodontic Working Length Measurement Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Images Obtained at Different Voxel Sizes and Field of Views, Periapical Radiography, and Apex Locator: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study. Yılmaz F; Kamburoğlu K; Şenel B J Endod; 2017 Jan; 43(1):152-156. PubMed ID: 27986097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of conventional and digital radiography in detecting external root resorption. Mesgarani A; Haghanifar S; Ehsani M; Yaghub SD; Bijani A Iran Endod J; 2014; 9(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 25386202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]