These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29184631)

  • 21. Influence of clinical experience on the radiographic determination of endodontic working length.
    Alothmani OS; Friedlander LT; Monteith BD; Chandler NP
    Int Endod J; 2013 Mar; 46(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 22882229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology.
    Lozano A; Forner L; Llena C
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):542-50. PubMed ID: 12190912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ex vivo investigation on the postoperative integrity of the apical constriction after the sole use of electronic working length determination.
    Wolgin M; Grundmann MJ; Tchorz JP; Frank W; Kielbassa AM
    J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():52-57. PubMed ID: 28642058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative study of periapical radiographic techniques with apex locator for endodontic working length estimation: an ex vivo study.
    Parekh V; Taluja C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 22186757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and Evaluation of an Endodontic Simulation Model for Dental Students.
    Wolgin M; Wiedemann P; Frank W; Wrbas KT; Kielbassa AM
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1363-72. PubMed ID: 26522643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison between two methods of working length determination and its effect on radiographic extent of root canal filling: a clinical study [ISRCTN71486641].
    Smadi L
    BMC Oral Health; 2006 Feb; 6():4. PubMed ID: 16472401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography.
    Aktan AM; Yildirim C; Karataşlıoğlu E; Çiftçi ME; Aksoy F
    Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():96-102. PubMed ID: 27339301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of an Electronic Apex Locator for Working Length Determination in Primary Anterior Teeth.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Soleymani AA; Modaresi J; Imanian M; Lotfian M
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Apr; 12(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 26622278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of conventional and digital radiography systems with regard to radiopacity of root canal filling materials.
    Akcay I; Ilhan B; Dundar N
    Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):730-6. PubMed ID: 22458866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or digital radiography on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial.
    Kara Tuncer A; Gerek M
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 24331988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2005 Sep; 23(3):124-5. PubMed ID: 16224130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
    Burger CL; Mork TO; Hutter JW; Nicoll B
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 10425952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Effect of root canal curvature on canal length measurement on digital image of human lower mandibular permanent incisor].
    Huang DM; Ling JQ; Luo SG; Li HL; Zheng GN; Zhou XD
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Sep; 38(5):829-31, 846. PubMed ID: 17953370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital subtraction radiography in detection of vertical root fractures: accuracy evaluation for root canal filling, fracture orientation and width variables. An ex-vivo study.
    Kapralos V; Koutroulis A; Irinakis E; Kouros P; Lyroudia K; Pitas I; Mikrogeorgis G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Oct; 24(10):3671-3681. PubMed ID: 32080760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Detection of Fractured Endodontic Instruments in Root Canals: Comparison between Different Digital Radiography Systems and Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Ramos Brito AC; Verner FS; Junqueira RB; Yamasaki MC; Queiroz PM; Freitas DQ; Oliveira-Santos C
    J Endod; 2017 Apr; 43(4):544-549. PubMed ID: 28216273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative Evaluation of Intraoral and Extraoral Periapical Radiographic Techniques in Determination of Working Length: An
    Sridhara A; Konde S; Noojadi SR; Kumar NC; Belludi AC
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(3):211-216. PubMed ID: 32904081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography.
    Mentes A; Gencoglu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 11805781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.