These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29184631)

  • 41. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings.
    Akdeniz BG; Soğur E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 15910475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro comparative study of conventional radiography and Root ZX apex locator in determining root canal working length.
    Javidi M; Moradi S; Rashed R; Raziee L
    N Y State Dent J; 2009; 75(4):48-51. PubMed ID: 19722483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative evaluation of three methods to measure working length - Manual tactile sensation, digital radiograph, and multidetector computed tomography: An
    Dutta K; Desai PD; Das UK; Sarkar S
    J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 28855751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study.
    Darda S; Manwar N; Chandak M; Shori DD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul; 10(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 19575053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of two methods of digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination.
    Maryam E; Farida A; Farhad A; Soraya K
    Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2013 Nov; 7(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 24533021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [In vitro comparison of an electronic root canal length measuring device and the radiographic determination of working length].
    Pommer O
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2001; 111(10):1165-70. PubMed ID: 11729819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD
    J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Impact of Different Diagnostic Imaging Modalities on the Evaluation of Root Canal Anatomy and Endodontic Residents' Stress Levels: A Clinical Study.
    Patel S; Patel R; Foschi F; Mannocci F
    J Endod; 2019 Apr; 45(4):406-413. PubMed ID: 30770279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation.
    Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K; Czajka J
    Int Endod J; 1995 May; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 8626199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study.
    Kishor KM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):550-3. PubMed ID: 23151708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The use of E-speed film for root canal length determination.
    Powell-Cullingford AW; Pitt Ford TR
    Int Endod J; 1993 Sep; 26(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 8300258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Void detection in root fillings using intraoral analogue, intraoral digital and cone beam CT images.
    Huybrechts B; Bud M; Bergmans L; Lambrechts P; Jacobs R
    Int Endod J; 2009 Aug; 42(8):675-85. PubMed ID: 19614788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical evaluation of apex locator and radiography in primary teeth.
    Oznurhan F; Ünal M; Kapdan A; Ozturk C; Aksoy S
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2015 May; 25(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 25073636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by three electronic root canal length measurement devices integrated into endodontic rotary motors.
    Ali MM; Wigler R; Lin S; Kaufman AY
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2303-2308. PubMed ID: 27392613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ravanshad S; Adl A; Anvar J
    J Endod; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1753-6. PubMed ID: 20951282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Difficulty assessment of root canal therapy in Chinese permanent maxillary anterior teeth].
    Gao XJ; Huang DM; Tan H; Jia LH; Zhou XD; Zheng GN
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Oct; 15(5):512-6. PubMed ID: 17348227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An in vivo evaluation of different methods of working length determination.
    Mandlik J; Shah N; Pawar K; Gupta P; Singh S; Shaik SA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 24309342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of Kodak Ultraspeed and Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray films for use in endodontics.
    Moule AJ; Wong A; Monsour PA; Basford KE
    Aust Dent J; 2001 Jun; 46(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11491237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro-computed tomographic imaging.
    Paes da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM; Rice D; Ordinola-Zapata R; Alvares Capelozza AL; Bramante CM; Jaramillo D; Christensen H
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24331989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The reliability of digital periapical films in diagnosis of root resorption].
    Sha HL; Bai YX; Li WC; Bi DY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 41(9):542-3. PubMed ID: 17129426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.