212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29184778)
1. Technical considerations to minimize complications of inguinal lymph node dissection.
Gupta MK; Patel AP; Master VA
Transl Androl Urol; 2017 Oct; 6(5):820-825. PubMed ID: 29184778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional, oncologic, and technical outcomes after endoscopic groin dissection for penile carcinoma.
Canter DJ; Dobbs RW; Jafri SM; Herrel LA; Ogan K; Delman KA; Master VA
Can J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):6395-400. PubMed ID: 22892266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morbidity of prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy with saphenous vein preservation for squamous cell penile carcinoma.
Milathianakis C; Bogdanos J; Karamanolakis D
Int J Urol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):776-8. PubMed ID: 16174057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what.
Elsamra SE; Poch MA
Transl Androl Urol; 2017 Oct; 6(5):826-832. PubMed ID: 29184779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Silva MN; Molina WR; Forseto PH; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1687-91. PubMed ID: 18657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma.
Bouchot O; Rigaud J; Maillet F; Hetet JF; Karam G
Eur Urol; 2004 Jun; 45(6):761-5; discussion 765-6. PubMed ID: 15149749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.
Heyns CF; Fleshner N; Sangar V; Schlenker B; Yuvaraja TB; van Poppel H
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. PubMed ID: 20691885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Outcomes of Robotic and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carcinoma of the Penis.
Singh A; Jaipuria J; Goel A; Shah S; Bhardwaj R; Baidya S; Jain J; Jain C; Rawal S
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 29307685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology.
Nabavizadeh R; Petrinec B; Nabavizadeh B; Singh A; Rawal S; Master V
Urol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 32855056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accurate staging of carcinoma of the penis in men with nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes by modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Parra RO
J Urol; 1996 Feb; 155(2):560-3. PubMed ID: 8558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.
Protzel C; Alcaraz A; Horenblas S; Pizzocaro G; Zlotta A; Hakenberg OW
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1075-88. PubMed ID: 19264390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preservation of the saphenous vein during laparoendoscopic single-site inguinal lymphadenectomy: comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique.
Yuan JB; Chen MF; Qi L; Li Y; Li YL; Chen C; Chen JB; Zu XB; Liu LF
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24947014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Minimally Invasive Technology for Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer.
Nabavizadeh R; Petrinec B; Necchi A; Tsaur I; Albersen M; Master V
J Clin Med; 2020 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 32756502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma.
Ravi R
Br J Urol; 1993 Dec; 72(6):941-5. PubMed ID: 8306161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Saphenous vein sparing during laparoscopic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma patients.
Cui Y; Chen H; Liu L; Chen Z; Chen J; Qi L; Zu X
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Mar; 48(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 26660956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Ornellas AA; Molina WR; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):953-7; discussion 958. PubMed ID: 17296386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morbidity and risk factors for complications of inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer.
Jeanne-Julien A; Bouchot O; De Vergie S; Branchereau J; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Rigaud J
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 36208315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical appraisal of laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein through subcutaneous approach via umbilical cord for the treatment of penile carcinoma: Report of 27 cases].
Wang LX; Zhang C; Yue DZ; Ge JP; Xu S; Dong J
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2023 Aug; 29(8):721-724. PubMed ID: 38619519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Light green up": Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-guided Robotic Bilateral Inguinal Lymphadenectomy by the Hypogastric Subcutaneous Approach for Penile Cancer.
Yuan P; Yao K; Zhou Z; Liu J; Li C; Hou W; Tang Y; Hu S; Wang L
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Nov; 45():1-7. PubMed ID: 36120419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radioisotope-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Penile Cancer: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.
Nemitz L; Vincke A; Michalik B; Engels S; Meyer LM; Henke RP; Wawroschek F; Winter A
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():850905. PubMed ID: 35494039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
