These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29185065)

  • 1. Consensus queries in ligand-based virtual screening experiments.
    Berenger F; Vu O; Meiler J
    J Cheminform; 2017 Nov; 9(1):60. PubMed ID: 29185065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis and comparison of 2D fingerprints: insights into database screening performance using eight fingerprint methods.
    Duan J; Dixon SL; Lowrie JF; Sherman W
    J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Sep; 29(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 20579912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combinatorial Consensus Scoring for Ligand-Based Virtual Fragment Screening: A Comparative Case Study for Serotonin 5-HT(3)A, Histamine H(1), and Histamine H(4) Receptors.
    Schultes S; Kooistra AJ; Vischer HF; Nijmeijer S; Haaksma EE; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 May; 55(5):1030-44. PubMed ID: 25815783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the relevance of query definition in the performance of 3D ligand-based virtual screening.
    Vázquez J; García R; Llinares P; Luque FJ; Herrero E
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2024 Apr; 38(1):18. PubMed ID: 38573547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereoselective virtual screening of the ZINC database using atom pair 3D-fingerprints.
    Awale M; Jin X; Reymond JL
    J Cheminform; 2015; 7():3. PubMed ID: 25750664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do Molecular Fingerprints Identify Diverse Active Drugs in Large-Scale Virtual Screening? (No).
    Venkatraman V; Gaiser J; Demekas D; Roy A; Xiong R; Wheeler TJ
    Pharmaceuticals (Basel); 2024 Jul; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 39204097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new ChEMBL dataset for the similarity-based target fishing engine FastTargetPred: Annotation of an exhaustive list of linear tetrapeptides.
    Tanwar S; Auberger P; Gillet G; DiPaola M; Tsaioun K; Villoutreix BO
    Data Brief; 2022 Jun; 42():108159. PubMed ID: 35496477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential Multimolecule Fingerprint for Similarity Search─Making Use of Active and Inactive Compound Sets in Virtual Screening.
    Hutter MC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(11):2726-2736. PubMed ID: 35613341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks: Strategies That Improve Early Recognition in Similarity-Based Virtual Screening.
    Liu R; AbdulHameed MDM; Wallqvist A
    Front Chem; 2019; 7():701. PubMed ID: 31709231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
    Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A probabilistic molecular fingerprint for big data settings.
    Probst D; Reymond JL
    J Cheminform; 2018 Dec; 10(1):66. PubMed ID: 30564943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of Ligand- and Target-Based Virtual Screening for the Discovery of Cruzain Inhibitors.
    Wiggers HJ; Rocha JR; Cheleski J; Montanari CA
    Mol Inform; 2011 Jun; 30(6-7):565-78. PubMed ID: 27467157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SABRE: ligand/structure-based virtual screening approach using consensus molecular-shape pattern recognition.
    Wei NN; Hamza A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 24328054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fingerprint scaling increases the probability of identifying molecules with similar activity in virtual screening calculations.
    Xue L; Stahura FL; Godden JW; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(3):746-53. PubMed ID: 11410055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. vSDC: a method to improve early recognition in virtual screening when limited experimental resources are available.
    Chaput L; Martinez-Sanz J; Quiniou E; Rigolet P; Saettel N; Mouawad L
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():1. PubMed ID: 26807156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How diverse are diversity assessment methods? A comparative analysis and benchmarking of molecular descriptor space.
    Koutsoukas A; Paricharak S; Galloway WR; Spring DR; Ijzerman AP; Glen RC; Marcus D; Bender A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 24289493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Domain-Specific Fingerprints Generated Through Neural Networks to Enhance Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.
    Menke J; Koch O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Feb; 61(2):664-675. PubMed ID: 33497572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adapting Document Similarity Measures for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.
    Himmat M; Salim N; Al-Dabbagh MM; Saeed F; Ahmed A
    Molecules; 2016 Apr; 21(4):476. PubMed ID: 27089312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ligand- and structure-based virtual screening on the DUD data set.
    von Korff M; Freyss J; Sander T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):209-31. PubMed ID: 19434824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring.
    Zhang Q; Muegge I
    J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(5):1536-48. PubMed ID: 16509572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.