These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29186748)

  • 1. [Impact of microphone position on sound localization in cochlear implant users].
    Bandeira M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2018 Feb; 97(2):92-99. PubMed ID: 29186748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Microphone Placement on Interaural Level Differences and Sound Localization Across the Horizontal Plane in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jones HG; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e341-5. PubMed ID: 27054512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left-right and front-back spatial hearing with multiple directional microphone configurations in modern hearing aids.
    Carette E; Van den Bogaert T; Laureyns M; Wouters J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):791-803. PubMed ID: 25405835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spectral directional cues captured by hearing device microphones in individual human ears.
    Denk F; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Oct; 144(4):2072. PubMed ID: 30404454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Understanding and Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Listeners Using a Pinna-Effect Imitating Microphone and an Adaptive Beamformer.
    Dorman MF; Natale S; Loiselle L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 29488870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements.
    Coudert A; Gaveau V; Gatel J; Verdelet G; Salemme R; Farne A; Pavani F; Truy E
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):192-205. PubMed ID: 34225320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Microphone Configuration on Speech Perception of Cochlear Implant Users in Traffic Noise.
    Weissgerber T; Bandeira M; Brendel M; Stöver T; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e198-e205. PubMed ID: 30741896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a pinna compensation algorithm for sound localization and speech perception in noise.
    Kuk F; Korhonen P; Lau C; Keenan D; Norgaard M
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23275583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pinna-Imitating Microphone Directionality Improves Sound Localization and Discrimination in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Fischer T; Schmid C; Kompis M; Mantokoudis G; Caversaccio M; Wimmer W
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):214-222. PubMed ID: 32701730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Localization of virtual sound sources with bilateral hearing aids in realistic acoustical scenes.
    Mueller MF; Kegel A; Schimmel SM; Dillier N; Hofbauer M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4732-42. PubMed ID: 22712946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sound source localization using hearing aids with microphones placed behind-the-ear, in-the-canal, and in-the-pinna.
    Van den Bogaert T; Carette E; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):164-76. PubMed ID: 21208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-dimensional localization of virtual sound sources in cochlear-implant listeners.
    Majdak P; Goupell MJ; Laback B
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 21052005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the Med-El Combi 40/40+cochlear implant system.
    Schoen F; Mueller J; Helms J; Nopp P
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 15891645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implant speech processor placement and compression effects on sound sensitivity and interaural level difference.
    Ricketts T; Grantham DW; D'Haese P; Edwards J; Barco A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Feb; 17(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 16640065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound localization abilities of unilateral hybrid cochlear implant users with bilateral low-frequency hearing.
    Lammers MJ; Lenarz T; van Zanten GA; Grolman W; Buechner A
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1433-9. PubMed ID: 24979396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.
    Jensen NS; Neher T; Laugesen S; Johannesson RB; Kragelund L
    Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):171-88. PubMed ID: 24216771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound localization with bilateral cochlear implants in noise: how much do head movements contribute to localization?
    Mueller MF; Meisenbacher K; Lai WK; Dillier N
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23684420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum Audible Angles Measured with Simulated Normally-Sized and Oversized Pinnas for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Test Subjects.
    Rønne FM; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Pedersen JH
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():207-217. PubMed ID: 27080661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.