244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29186879)
1. The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them).
Wicherts JM
Animals (Basel); 2017 Nov; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 29186879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.
Marusic A; Wager E; Utrobicic A; Rothstein HR; Sambunjak D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(4):MR000038. PubMed ID: 27040721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.
Andrade C
J Clin Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 82(1):. PubMed ID: 33999541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice.
Farrar BG; Ostojić L; Clayton NS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256607. PubMed ID: 34464406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing an open science 'mindset'.
Hagger MS
Health Psychol Behav Med; 2022; 10(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 34993003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Publication and related biases in health services research: a systematic review of empirical evidence.
Ayorinde AA; Williams I; Mannion R; Song F; Skrybant M; Lilford RJ; Chen YF
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):137. PubMed ID: 32487022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What do participants think of our research practices? An examination of behavioural psychology participants' preferences.
Bottesini JG; Rhemtulla M; Vazire S
R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Apr; 9(4):200048. PubMed ID: 35425627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Researchers' View of Scientific Rigor-Survey on the Conduct and Reporting of In Vivo Research.
Reichlin TS; Vogt L; Würbel H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0165999. PubMed ID: 27911901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adapting Open Science and Pre-registration to Longitudinal Research.
Petersen IT; Apfelbaum KS; McMurray B
Infant Child Dev; 2024; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 38425545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
Büttner F; Toomey E; McClean S; Roe M; Delahunt E
Br J Sports Med; 2020 Nov; 54(22):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 32699001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental design and reporting standards for improving the internal validity of pre-clinical studies in the field of pain: Consensus of the IMI-Europain consortium.
Knopp KL; Stenfors C; Baastrup C; Bannon AW; Calvo M; Caspani O; Currie G; Finnerup NB; Huang W; Kennedy JD; Lefevre I; Machin I; Macleod M; Rees H; Rice ASC; Rutten K; Segerdahl M; Serra J; Wodarski R; Berge OG; Treede RD
Scand J Pain; 2015 Apr; 7(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 29911603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.
Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; 41(16):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 38018365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific publishing: a systematic review.
Kern-Goldberger AR; James R; Berghella V; Miller ES
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 227(1):43-50.e4. PubMed ID: 35120887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preregistration in practice: A comparison of preregistered and non-preregistered studies in psychology.
van den Akker OR; van Assen MALM; Bakker M; Elsherif M; Wong TK; Wicherts JM
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37950113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducible pharmacokinetics.
Ioannidis JPA
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2019 Apr; 46(2):111-116. PubMed ID: 31004315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
