These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29186950)

  • 1. Descriptor Data Bank (DDB): A Cloud Platform for Multiperspective Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):134-147. PubMed ID: 29186950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparative Assessment of Predictive Accuracies of Conventional and Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(2):335-47. PubMed ID: 26357221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ID-Score: a new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions.
    Li GB; Yang LL; Wang WJ; Li LL; Yang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23394072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An orientation sensitive approach in biomolecule interaction quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling and its application in ion-exchange chromatography.
    Kittelmann J; Lang KM; Ottens M; Hubbuch J
    J Chromatogr A; 2017 Jan; 1482():48-56. PubMed ID: 28038836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative assessment of ranking accuracies of conventional and machine-learning-based scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1301-13. PubMed ID: 22411892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FlexX-Scan: fast, structure-based virtual screening.
    Schellhammer I; Rarey M
    Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(3):504-17. PubMed ID: 15382244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PyDPI: freely available python package for chemoinformatics, bioinformatics, and chemogenomics studies.
    Cao DS; Liang YZ; Yan J; Tan GS; Xu QS; Liu S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3086-96. PubMed ID: 24047419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
    Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ASFP (Artificial Intelligence based Scoring Function Platform): a web server for the development of customized scoring functions.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Guo X; Wang Z; Weng G; Ye Q; Wang G; He Q; Yang B; Cao D; Hou T
    J Cheminform; 2021 Feb; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 33541407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GemAffinity: a scoring function for predicting binding affinity and virtual screening.
    Hsu KC; Chen YF; Yang JM
    Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2012; 6(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 22479817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PLIC: protein-ligand interaction clusters.
    Anand P; Nagarajan D; Mukherjee S; Chandra N
    Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014(0):bau029. PubMed ID: 24763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distance dependent scoring function for describing protein-ligand intermolecular interactions.
    Artemenko N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 18290639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BgN-Score and BsN-Score: bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S8. PubMed ID: 25734685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GeauxDock: A novel approach for mixed-resolution ligand docking using a descriptor-based force field.
    Ding Y; Fang Y; Feinstein WP; Ramanujam J; Koppelman DM; Moreno J; Brylinski M; Jarrell M
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Oct; 36(27):2013-26. PubMed ID: 26250822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hierarchical PLS modeling for predicting the binding of a comprehensive set of structurally diverse protein-ligand complexes.
    Lindström A; Pettersson F; Almqvist F; Berglund A; Kihlberg J; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1154-67. PubMed ID: 16711735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Van der Waals Potential in Protein Complexes.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():79-91. PubMed ID: 31452100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How diverse are diversity assessment methods? A comparative analysis and benchmarking of molecular descriptor space.
    Koutsoukas A; Paricharak S; Galloway WR; Spring DR; Ijzerman AP; Glen RC; Marcus D; Bender A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 24289493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.