These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Toward quantitative characterization of the binding profile between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain and its peptide ligands. He P; Wu W; Wang HD; Yang K; Liao KL; Zhang W Amino Acids; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1209-18. PubMed ID: 19669081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Specific and nonspecific interaction forces between Escherichia coli and silicon nitride, determined by poisson statistical analysis. Abu-Lail NI; Camesano TA Langmuir; 2006 Aug; 22(17):7296-301. PubMed ID: 16893229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. PEARLS: program for energetic analysis of receptor-ligand system. Han LY; Lin HH; Li ZR; Zheng CJ; Cao ZW; Xie B; Chen YZ J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):445-50. PubMed ID: 16426079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Generalized modeling of enzyme-ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures. Strömbergsson H; Kryshtafovych A; Prusis P; Fidelis K; Wikberg JE; Komorowski J; Hvidsten TR Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 16948162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Machine-learning scoring functions for identifying native poses of ligands docked to known and novel proteins. Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 25916860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces. Burgoyne NJ; Jackson RM Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(11):1335-42. PubMed ID: 16522669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Establishment of an in silico phospholipidosis prediction method using descriptors related to molecular interactions causing phospholipid-compound complex formation. Haranosono Y; Nemoto S; Kurata M; Sakaki H J Toxicol Sci; 2016 Apr; 41(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 26961617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein-ligand Complexes. Pason LP; Sotriffer CA Mol Inform; 2016 Dec; 35(11-12):541-548. PubMed ID: 27870243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Convex-PL: a novel knowledge-based potential for protein-ligand interactions deduced from structural databases using convex optimization. Kadukova M; Grudinin S J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Oct; 31(10):943-958. PubMed ID: 28921375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions. Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of ligand- and structure-based virtual screening on the DUD data set. von Korff M; Freyss J; Sander T J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):209-31. PubMed ID: 19434824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Using structural motif descriptors for sequence-based binding site prediction. Henschel A; Winter C; Kim WK; Schroeder M BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S5. PubMed ID: 17570148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]