These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29186950)

  • 21. PostDOCK: a structural, empirical approach to scoring protein ligand complexes.
    Springer C; Adalsteinsson H; Young MM; Kegelmeyer PW; Roe DC
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(22):6821-31. PubMed ID: 16250641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities using novel geometrical descriptors and machine-learning methods.
    Deng W; Breneman C; Embrechts MJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):699-703. PubMed ID: 15032552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Toward quantitative characterization of the binding profile between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain and its peptide ligands.
    He P; Wu W; Wang HD; Yang K; Liao KL; Zhang W
    Amino Acids; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1209-18. PubMed ID: 19669081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Specific and nonspecific interaction forces between Escherichia coli and silicon nitride, determined by poisson statistical analysis.
    Abu-Lail NI; Camesano TA
    Langmuir; 2006 Aug; 22(17):7296-301. PubMed ID: 16893229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. PEARLS: program for energetic analysis of receptor-ligand system.
    Han LY; Lin HH; Li ZR; Zheng CJ; Cao ZW; Xie B; Chen YZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):445-50. PubMed ID: 16426079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Generalized modeling of enzyme-ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures.
    Strömbergsson H; Kryshtafovych A; Prusis P; Fidelis K; Wikberg JE; Komorowski J; Hvidsten TR
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 16948162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Machine-learning scoring functions for identifying native poses of ligands docked to known and novel proteins.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 25916860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extended connectivity interaction features: improving binding affinity prediction through chemical description.
    Sánchez-Cruz N; Medina-Franco JL; Mestres J; Barril X
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 37(10):1376-1382. PubMed ID: 33226061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces.
    Burgoyne NJ; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(11):1335-42. PubMed ID: 16522669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Establishment of an in silico phospholipidosis prediction method using descriptors related to molecular interactions causing phospholipid-compound complex formation.
    Haranosono Y; Nemoto S; Kurata M; Sakaki H
    J Toxicol Sci; 2016 Apr; 41(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 26961617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Descriptor-based protein remote homology identification.
    Zhang Z; Kochhar S; Grigorov MG
    Protein Sci; 2005 Feb; 14(2):431-44. PubMed ID: 15632283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Encoding protein-ligand interaction patterns in fingerprints and graphs.
    Desaphy J; Raimbaud E; Ducrot P; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):623-37. PubMed ID: 23432543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CREDO: a protein-ligand interaction database for drug discovery.
    Schreyer A; Blundell T
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Feb; 73(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 19207418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.
    Shin WH; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():41-50. PubMed ID: 26427548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simple knowledge-based descriptors to predict protein-ligand interactions. methodology and validation.
    Nissink JWM ; Verdonk ML; Klebe G
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2000 Nov; 14(8):787-803. PubMed ID: 11131970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein-ligand Complexes.
    Pason LP; Sotriffer CA
    Mol Inform; 2016 Dec; 35(11-12):541-548. PubMed ID: 27870243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Convex-PL: a novel knowledge-based potential for protein-ligand interactions deduced from structural databases using convex optimization.
    Kadukova M; Grudinin S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Oct; 31(10):943-958. PubMed ID: 28921375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.
    Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of ligand- and structure-based virtual screening on the DUD data set.
    von Korff M; Freyss J; Sander T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):209-31. PubMed ID: 19434824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using structural motif descriptors for sequence-based binding site prediction.
    Henschel A; Winter C; Kim WK; Schroeder M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S5. PubMed ID: 17570148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.