These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29188426)

  • 1. Investigating the contribution of task and response repetitions to the sequential modulations of attentional cueing effects.
    Ansorge U; Gozli DG; Goller F
    Psychol Res; 2019 Sep; 83(6):1251-1268. PubMed ID: 29188426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments.
    Goller F; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1574-84. PubMed ID: 25832193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feature-based attention elicited by precueing in an orientation discrimination task.
    Huang D; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Bu X; Chen Y
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():15-25. PubMed ID: 29763696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of display-to-display feature changes on net cueing effects: Evidence for a contribution of object-file updating.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):908-919. PubMed ID: 31931666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating Object Files in Spatial Cueing.
    Büsel C; Valuch C; Bliem HR; Sachse P; Ansorge U
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 68(2):67-80. PubMed ID: 34155904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of the global/local probability effect on the neural processing of cues and targets. A functional systems approach.
    Arjona A; Rodríguez E; Morales M; Gómez CM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():52-61. PubMed ID: 30342061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aging effects in cueing tasks as assessed by the ideal observer: peripheral cues.
    Swan EF; Hutchinson CV; Everard M; Shimozaki SS
    J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Fuchs I; Theeuwes J; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):737-48. PubMed ID: 25520044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion.
    Denefrio S; Simmons A; Jha A; Dennis-Tiwary TA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179714. PubMed ID: 28683069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.
    Paladini RE; Diana L; Zito GA; Nyffeler T; Wyss P; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T; Cazzoli D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190677. PubMed ID: 29293637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification and location tasks rely on different mental processes: a diffusion model account of validity effects in spatial cueing paradigms with emotional stimuli.
    Imhoff R; Lange J; Germar M
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):231-244. PubMed ID: 29468932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.
    Lai G; Mangels JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 May; 45(9):2038-50. PubMed ID: 17382975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic coding of events within the inferior frontal gyrus in a probabilistic selective attention task.
    Vossel S; Weidner R; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):414-24. PubMed ID: 20146598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequence effects in a spatial cueing task: endogenous orienting is sensitive to orienting in the preceding trial.
    Jongen EM; Smulders FT
    Psychol Res; 2007 Sep; 71(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 16710720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional capture by spoken language: effects on netballers' visual task performance.
    Bishop DT; Moore S; Horne S; Teszka R
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(17):1611-20. PubMed ID: 24734776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The attentional effects of peripheral cueing as revealed by two event-related potential studies.
    Fu S; Fan S; Chen L; Zhuo Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Jan; 112(1):172-85. PubMed ID: 11137676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.