These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29188426)

  • 21. Sequential P3 effects in a Posner's spatial cueing paradigm: trial-by-trial learning of the predictive value of the cue.
    Gómez CM; Flores A; Digiacomo MR; Vázquez-Marrufo M
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2009; 69(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 19593330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):429-437. PubMed ID: 27896707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture.
    Arnott SR; Pratt J; Shore DI; Alain C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):383-95. PubMed ID: 11689298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. I. Anti-cues for pro-saccades.
    Fischer B; Weber H
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 9655226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The functional role of alternation advantage in the sequence effect of symbolic cueing with nonpredictive arrow cues.
    Qian Q; Song M; Shinomori K; Wang F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1430-6. PubMed ID: 22718205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex.
    Vossel S; Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16846742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trial-by-trial modulations in the orienting of attention elicited by gaze and arrow cues.
    Ciardo F; Ricciardelli P; Iani C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):543-556. PubMed ID: 29589789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Same-location costs in peripheral cueing: The role of cue awareness and feature changes.
    Schoeberl T; Ditye T; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):433-451. PubMed ID: 28816482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional processing of colour and location cues.
    Dunai J; Castiello U; Rossetti Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jun; 138(4):520-6. PubMed ID: 11465751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deficient inhibition of return for emotional faces in depression.
    Dai Q; Feng Z
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 33(6):921-32. PubMed ID: 19394388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cue validity probability influences neural processing of targets.
    Arjona A; Escudero M; Gómez CM
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Sep; 119():171-83. PubMed ID: 27430935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects.
    Büsel C; Voracek M; Ansorge U
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):784-809. PubMed ID: 30171425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of lateralized cues on the processing of lateralized auditory stimuli.
    Schröger E; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 1996 Jun; 43(3):203-26. PubMed ID: 8831955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Disentangling attention from action in the emotional spatial cueing task.
    Mulckhuyse M; Crombez G
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(7):1223-41. PubMed ID: 24467679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.