BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29188576)

  • 1. Modeling and Deorphanization of Orphan GPCRs.
    Diaz C; Angelloz-Nicoud P; Pihan E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():413-429. PubMed ID: 29188576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods for Virtual Screening of GPCR Targets: Approaches and Challenges.
    Cross JB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():233-264. PubMed ID: 29188566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual screen for ligands of orphan G protein-coupled receptors.
    Bock JR; Gough DA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1402-14. PubMed ID: 16180917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using silico methods predicting ligands for orphan GPCRs.
    Jiang Z; Zhou Y
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2006 Oct; 7(5):459-64. PubMed ID: 17073696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synergistic Use of GPCR Modeling and SDM Experiments to Understand Ligand Binding.
    Potterton A; Heifetz A; Townsend-Nicholson A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():335-343. PubMed ID: 29188570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GPCR Homology Model Generation for Lead Optimization.
    Tautermann CS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():115-131. PubMed ID: 29188560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Structural Framework for GPCR Chemogenomics: What's In a Residue Number?
    Vass M; Kooistra AJ; Verhoeven S; Gloriam D; de Esch IJP; de Graaf C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():73-113. PubMed ID: 29188559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioinformatics-based discovery and identification of new biologically active peptides for GPCR deorphanization.
    Colette J; Avé E; Grenier-Boley B; Coquel AS; Lesellier K; Puget K
    J Pept Sci; 2007 Sep; 13(9):568-74. PubMed ID: 17694568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
    Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From heptahelical bundle to hits from the Haystack: structure-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands.
    Kooistra AJ; Roumen L; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 522():279-336. PubMed ID: 23374191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
    Jaiteh M; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Selent J; Carlsson J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational Methods Used in Hit-to-Lead and Lead Optimization Stages of Structure-Based Drug Discovery.
    Heifetz A; Southey M; Morao I; Townsend-Nicholson A; Bodkin MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():375-394. PubMed ID: 29188574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ligand-independent translocation assay: an enabling technology for screening orphan G protein-coupled receptors by arrestin recruitment.
    Oakley RH; Hudson CC; Sjaastad MD; Loomis CR
    Methods Enzymol; 2006; 414():50-63. PubMed ID: 17110186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational methods for studying G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).
    Kaczor AA; Rutkowska E; Bartuzi D; Targowska-Duda KM; Matosiuk D; Selent J
    Methods Cell Biol; 2016; 132():359-99. PubMed ID: 26928552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emerging Approaches to GPCR Ligand Screening for Drug Discovery.
    Kumari P; Ghosh E; Shukla AK
    Trends Mol Med; 2015 Nov; 21(11):687-701. PubMed ID: 26481827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Analysis of QSAR-based vs. Chemical Similarity Based Predictors of GPCRs Binding Affinity.
    Luo M; Wang XS; Tropsha A
    Mol Inform; 2016 Jan; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 27491652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors.
    Bhunia SS; Saxena AK
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(4):269-294. PubMed ID: 32901584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of Docking-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands with Homology Modeled Structures: A Case Study of the Angiotensin II Type I Receptor.
    Chen H; Fu W; Wang Z; Wang X; Lei T; Zhu F; Li D; Chang S; Xu L; Hou T
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 10(1):677-689. PubMed ID: 30265513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opportunities and Challenges in the Discovery of Allosteric Modulators of GPCRs.
    Bartuzi D; Kaczor AA; Matosiuk D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():297-319. PubMed ID: 29188568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of Ligand Binding to GPCRs Through Computational Methods.
    Vasile S; Esguerra M; Jespers W; Oliveira A; Sallander J; Åqvist J; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():23-44. PubMed ID: 29188557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.