566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29189214)
1. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biostatistics Series Module 3: Comparing Groups: Numerical Variables.
Hazra A; Gogtay N
Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 27293244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
McGee M
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200837. PubMed ID: 30040850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The paired t test and beyond: Recommendations for testing the central tendencies of two paired samples in research on speech, language and hearing pathology.
Rietveld T; van Hout R
J Commun Disord; 2017 Sep; 69():44-57. PubMed ID: 28777928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hypothesis testing III: counts and medians.
Applegate KE; Tello R; Ying J
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 12881587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test Statistics and Confidence Intervals to Establish Noninferiority between Treatments with Ordinal Categorical Data.
Zhang F; Miyaoka E; Huang F; Tanaka Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):921-38. PubMed ID: 24919157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Basic concepts of statistical analysis for surgical research.
Cassidy LD
J Surg Res; 2005 Oct; 128(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16140341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fundamentals of Research Data and Variables: The Devil Is in the Details.
Vetter TR
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1375-1380. PubMed ID: 28787341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeated Measures Designs and Analysis of Longitudinal Data: If at First You Do Not Succeed-Try, Try Again.
Schober P; Vetter TR
Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):569-575. PubMed ID: 29905618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of two-part models with competitors.
Lachenbruch PA
Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1215-34. PubMed ID: 11304737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tutorials in clinical research: VII. Understanding comparative statistics (contrast)--part B: application of T-test, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-square.
Neely JG; Hartman JM; Forsen JW; Wallace MS
Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1719-25. PubMed ID: 14520096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
Lachin JM
Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals with other rank-based methods for the two-sample problem in ordered categorical data.
Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):371-385. PubMed ID: 36533908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical grand rounds: a review of analysis and sample size calculation considerations for Wilcoxon tests.
Divine G; Norton HJ; Hunt R; Dienemann J
Anesth Analg; 2013 Sep; 117(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 23456667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Basic Introduction to Statistics in Medicine, Part 2: Comparing Data.
Bensken WP; Ho VP; Pieracci FM
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2021 Aug; 22(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 34270362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions?
Skovlund E; Fenstad GU
J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 54(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 11165471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of paired Likert data: how to evaluate change and preference questions.
Roberson PK; Shema SJ; Mundfrom DJ; Holmes TM
Fam Med; 1995; 27(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 8582561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
