These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29190085)

  • 21. Protein ligand docking based on empirical method for binding affinity estimation.
    Tao P; Lai L
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2001 May; 15(5):429-46. PubMed ID: 11394737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Structural artifacts in protein-ligand X-ray structures: implications for the development of docking scoring functions.
    Søndergaard CR; Garrett AE; Carstensen T; Pollastri G; Nielsen JE
    J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 52(18):5673-84. PubMed ID: 19711919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An NMR-Guided Screening Method for Selective Fragment Docking and Synthesis of a Warhead Inhibitor.
    Khattri RB; Morris DL; Davis CM; Bilinovich SM; Caras AJ; Panzner MJ; Debord MA; Leeper TC
    Molecules; 2016 Jul; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 27438815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Postprocessing of docked protein-ligand complexes using implicit solvation models.
    Lindström A; Edvinsson L; Johansson A; Andersson CD; Andersson IE; Raubacher F; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 21309544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An Efficient ABC_DE_Based Hybrid Algorithm for Protein-Ligand Docking.
    Guan B; Zhang C; Zhao Y
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Apr; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 29652791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking.
    Plewczynski D; Philips A; Von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 21091053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 17380512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multi-Body Interactions in Molecular Docking Program Devised with Key Water Molecules in Protein Binding Sites.
    Xiao W; Wang D; Shen Z; Li S; Li H
    Molecules; 2018 Sep; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 30208655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization.
    Pearce BC; Langley DR; Kang J; Huang H; Kulkarni A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1797-809. PubMed ID: 19552372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Advancing fragment binders to lead-like compounds using ligand and protein-based NMR spectroscopy.
    Maurer T
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 493():469-85. PubMed ID: 21371602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A python-based docking program utilizing a receptor bound ligand shape: PythDock.
    Chung JY; Cho SJ; Hah JM
    Arch Pharm Res; 2011 Sep; 34(9):1451-8. PubMed ID: 21975806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. DockBench as docking selector tool: the lesson learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Salmaso V; Sturlese M; Cuzzolin A; Moro S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):773-789. PubMed ID: 27638810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Molecular modelling prediction of ligand binding site flexibility.
    Yang AY; Källblad P; Mancera RL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2004 Apr; 18(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 15562988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of input differences on the results of docking calculations.
    Feher M; Williams CI
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1704-14. PubMed ID: 19530660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015.
    Slynko I; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):669-683. PubMed ID: 27480696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. HIGA: A Running History Information Guided Genetic Algorithm for Protein-Ligand Docking.
    Guan B; Zhang C; Zhao Y
    Molecules; 2017 Dec; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 29244750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ligand
    Platzer G; Ptaszek AL; Böttcher J; Fuchs JE; Geist L; Braun D; McConnell DB; Konrat R; Sánchez-Murcia PA; Mayer M
    Chemphyschem; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e202300636. PubMed ID: 37955910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Blind docking method combining search of low-resolution binding sites with ligand pose refinement by molecular dynamics-based global optimization.
    Vorobjev YN
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Apr; 31(5):1080-92. PubMed ID: 19821514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.