These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29190488)

  • 1. The effect of simulated unilateral hearing loss on horizontal sound localization accuracy and recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech.
    Asp F; Jakobsson AM; Berninger E
    Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():54-63. PubMed ID: 29190488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Tinnitus and Duration of Deafness on Sound Localization and Speech Recognition in Noise in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Liu YW; Cheng X; Chen B; Peng K; Ishiyama A; Fu QJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518813802. PubMed ID: 30509148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Simulated and Profound Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Recognition of Speech in Competing Speech.
    Asp F; Reinfeldt S
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 31356386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):159-173. PubMed ID: 28067750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Popelka GR
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices.
    Denanto FM; Wales J; Tideholm B; Asp F
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1708-1720. PubMed ID: 35588503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Children With Congenital Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Effects of Late Hearing Aid Amplification-A Pilot Study.
    Johansson M; Asp F; Berninger E
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 30998543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Griffin AM; Poissant SF; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):887-904. PubMed ID: 30418282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Audibility and Suprathreshold Deficits on Speech Recognition for Listeners With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Bost TJM; Versfeld NJ; Goverts ST
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 31242137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adults with unilateral congenital ear canal atresia - sound localization ability and recognition of speech in competing speech in unaided condition.
    Siegbahn M; Engmér Berglin C; Hultcrantz M; Asp F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Jul; 141(7):689-694. PubMed ID: 34057381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
    Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.
    Best V; Mejia J; Freeston K; van Hoesel RJ; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):727-35. PubMed ID: 26140298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial Hearing and Functional Auditory Skills in Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Corbin NE; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Nov; 64(11):4495-4512. PubMed ID: 34609204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
    Alexander JM; Rallapalli V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.