These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2919069)

  • 41. [Are additional filters made of niobium superior to the copper filter in dental radiology?].
    Cordt I; Engelke W
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(10):1160-3. PubMed ID: 2237349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
    Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Niobium filtration in dental radiology. Effects on image quality and on dosage].
    Bianchi SD; Giovannetti P; Albrito F
    Radiol Med; 1997 Jun; 93(6):681-5. PubMed ID: 9411513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Rohlin M; White SC
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 1520917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
    Preece JW; Jensen CW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of new radiographic screens for intraoral radiography.
    Dawood FF; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Aug; 48(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 289085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Single-energy pediatric chest computed tomography with spectral filtration at 100 kVp: effects on radiation parameters and image quality.
    Bodelle B; Fischbach C; Booz C; Yel I; Frellesen C; Kaup M; Beeres M; Vogl TJ; Scholtz JE
    Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Jun; 47(7):831-837. PubMed ID: 28352977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality.
    Benz C; Mouyen F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Erbium filtration for dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Horner K; Lawinski CP; Smith NJ
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):609-12. PubMed ID: 3408849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparative study of radiographic quality with five periapical techniques in general dental practice.
    Rushton VE; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 8181658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose.
    Palomo JM; Rao PS; Hans MG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 18424119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intraoral computed radiography using the Fuji computed radiography imaging plate. Correlation between image quality and reading condition.
    Kashima I; Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Aoki H; Ishii M; Kanagawa Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Aug; 78(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 7936596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Baksi BG; Sen BH; Eyuboglu TF
    J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1101-4. PubMed ID: 18718374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Image optimization in digital dental radiography.
    Silverstrim KJ; Schneider E; van der Hoeven C
    Health Phys; 2015 Jun; 108(6):580-91. PubMed ID: 25905519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality control and diagnostic reference levels in intraoral dental radiographic facilities.
    Hatziioannou K; Psarouli E; Papanastassiou E; Bousbouras P; Kodona H; Kimoundri O; Delichas M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Sep; 34(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 16120881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Review article: radiation protection in dental radiology.
    Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Nov; 67(803):1041-9. PubMed ID: 7820393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.