163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29190768)
1. Medical costs, Cesarean delivery rates, and length of stay in specialty hospitals vs. non-specialty hospitals in South Korea.
Kim SJ; Kim SJ; Han KT; Park EC
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188612. PubMed ID: 29190768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Costs and Their Determinant of Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery: An Exploratory Study in Chongqing Municipality, China.
He Z; Cheng Z; Wu T; Zhou Y; Chen J; Fu Q; Feng Z
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5685261. PubMed ID: 27995142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of the inpatient charge and length of stay for patients with joint diseases in Korea: specialty versus small general hospitals.
Kim SJ; Park EC; Jang SI; Lee M; Kim TH
Health Policy; 2013 Nov; 113(1-2):93-9. PubMed ID: 24139937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Diagnosis-Related Group Payment System on Quality of Care in the Field of Obstetrics and Gynecology among Korean Tertiary Hospitals.
Jung YW; Pak H; Lee I; Kim EH
Yonsei Med J; 2018 Jun; 59(4):539-545. PubMed ID: 29749137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Healthcare Spending and Performance of Specialty Hospitals: Nationwide Evidence from Colorectal-Anal Specialty Hospitals in South Korea.
Kim SJ; Lee SG; Kim TH; Park EC
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Nov; 56(6):1721-30. PubMed ID: 26446659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Caesarean section rate and cost control effectiveness of case payment reform in the new cooperative medical scheme for delivery: evidence from Xi County, China.
Liu S; Wang J; Zhang L; Zhang X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Mar; 18(1):66. PubMed ID: 29523121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Governmental designation of spine specialty hospitals, their characteristics, performance and designation effects: a longitudinal study in Korea.
Kim SJ; Yoo JW; Lee SG; Kim TH; Han KT; Park EC
BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e006525. PubMed ID: 25394819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches.
Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of a diagnosis-related group payment system on cesarean section in Korea.
Kim SJ; Han KT; Kim SJ; Park EC; Park HK
Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 120(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 27173768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan.
Xirasagar S; Lin HC; Liu TC
Health Policy Plan; 2006 Jul; 21(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 16790455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An investigation of Caesarean sections in three Greek hospitals: the impact of financial incentives and convenience.
Mossialos E; Allin S; Karras K; Davaki K
Eur J Public Health; 2005 Jun; 15(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 15923214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications.
Lin HC; Xirasagar S
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 14704256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hidden Costs of Hospital-Based Delivery Among Women Using Public Hospitals in Bale Zone, Southeast Ethiopia.
Merga M; Debela TF; Alaro T
J Prim Care Community Health; 2019; 10():2150132719896447. PubMed ID: 31865840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Do hospital characteristics influence Cesarean delivery? Analysis of National Health Insurance claim data.
Han KT; Kim SJ; Ju YJ; Choi JW; Park EC
Eur J Public Health; 2017 Oct; 27(5):801-807. PubMed ID: 28482066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Participation determinants in the DRG payment system of obstetrics and gynecology clinics in South Korea.
Song JK; Kim CY
J Prev Med Public Health; 2010 Mar; 43(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 20383044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One health maintenance organization's experience: obstetric costs depend more on staffing patterns than on mode of delivery.
Finkler MD; Wirtschafter DD
J Perinatol; 1997; 17(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 9134516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Timing of scheduled cesarean delivery in patients on a teaching versus private service: adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and neonatal outcomes.
Laye MR; Dellinger EH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):577-82; discussion 582-4. PubMed ID: 16777051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for inter-hospital differences in cesarean section rates in low-risk deliveries using administrative data: an initiative to improve the quality of care.
Aelvoet W; Windey F; Molenberghs G; Verstraelen H; Van Reempts P; Foidart JM
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():3. PubMed ID: 18177493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of patient risk on the volume-outcome relationship in obstetric delivery services.
Lee KS; Kwak JM
Health Policy; 2014 Dec; 118(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 24957418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
