BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29191101)

  • 1. Despite worse baseline status depressed patients achieved outcomes similar to those in nondepressed patients after surgery for cervical deformity.
    Poorman GW; Passias PG; Horn SR; Frangella NJ; Daniels AH; Hamilton DK; Kim H; Sciubba D; Diebo BG; Bortz CA; Segreto FA; Kelly MP; Smith JS; Neuman BJ; Shaffrey CI; LaFage V; LaFage R; Ames CP; Hart R; Mundis GM; Eastlack R;
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E10. PubMed ID: 29191101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the combined occurrence of poor clinical and radiographic outcomes following cervical deformity corrective surgery.
    Horn SR; Passias PG; Oh C; Lafage V; Lafage R; Smith JS; Line B; Anand N; Segreto FA; Bortz CA; Scheer JK; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Mummaneni PV; Daniels AH; Park P; Nunley PD; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Nov; 32(2):182-190. PubMed ID: 31675700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.
    Protopsaltis TS; Scheer JK; Terran JS; Smith JS; Hamilton DK; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Hart RA; McCarthy IM; Klineberg E; Lafage V; Bess S; Schwab F; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 25978077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are the sagittal cervical radiographic modifiers of the Ames-ISSG classification specific to adult cervical deformity?
    Bakouny Z; Khalil N; Otayek J; Bizdikian AJ; Yared F; Salameh M; Bou Zeid N; Ghanem I; Kharrat K; Kreichati G; Lafage R; Lafage V; Assi A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):483-490. PubMed ID: 30052148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients.
    Scheer JK; Passias PG; Sorocean AM; Boniello AJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Kim HJ; Protopsaltis TS; Gupta M; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Lafage V; Smith JS; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 26360147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Relationship Between Improvements in Myelopathy and Sagittal Realignment in Cervical Deformity Surgery Outcomes.
    Passias PG; Horn SR; Bortz CA; Ramachandran S; Burton DC; Protopsaltis T; Lafage R; Lafage V; Diebo BG; Poorman GW; Segreto FA; Smith JS; Ames C; Shaffrey CI; Kim HJ; Neuman B; Daniels AH; Soroceanu A; Klineberg E;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Aug; 43(16):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 29462071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoperative alignment goals for distinctive sagittal morphotypes of severe cervical deformity to achieve optimal improvements in health-related quality of life measures.
    Virk S; Passias P; Lafage R; Klineberg E; Mundis G; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Bess S; Burton D; Hart R; Kim HJ; Ames C; Schwab F; Smith J; Lafage V;
    Spine J; 2020 Aug; 20(8):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 32209421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnitude of preoperative cervical lordotic compensation and C2-T3 angle are correlated to increased risk of postoperative sagittal spinal pelvic malalignment in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.
    Passias PG; Soroceanu A; Scheer J; Yang S; Boniello A; Smith JS; Protopsaltis T; Kim HJ; Schwab F; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Mundis G; Lafage R; Hart R; Shaffrey C; Lafage V; Ames C;
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1756-63. PubMed ID: 25862507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicability of cervical sagittal vertical axis, cervical lordosis, and T1 slope on pain and disability outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients without deformity.
    Lau D; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AK; Dalle Ore CL; Virk MS; Chou D; Bisson EF; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Oct; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 31628295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?
    Passfall L; Williamson TK; Krol O; Lebovic J; Imbo B; Joujon-Roche R; Tretiakov P; Dangas K; Owusu-Sarpong S; Koller H; Schoenfeld AJ; Diebo BG; Vira S; Lafage R; Lafage V; Passias PG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Sep; 37(3):368-375. PubMed ID: 35426823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative analysis of the prevalence and characteristics of cervical malalignment in adults presenting with thoracolumbar spine deformity based on variations in treatment approach over 2 years.
    Jalai CM; Passias PG; Lafage V; Smith JS; Lafage R; Poorman GW; Diebo B; Liabaud B; Neuman BJ; Scheer JK; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Aug; 25(8):2423-32. PubMed ID: 27076049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Lee CK; Shin DA; Yi S; Kim KN; Shin HC; Yoon DH; Ha Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 26431070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recovery kinetics following spinal deformity correction: a comparison of isolated cervical, thoracolumbar, and combined deformity morphometries.
    Passias PG; Segreto FA; Lafage R; Lafage V; Smith JS; Line BG; Scheer JK; Mundis GM; Hamilton DK; Kim HJ; Horn SR; Bortz CA; Diebo BG; Vira S; Gupta MC; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP; Bess S;
    Spine J; 2019 Aug; 19(8):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 30930292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Importance of C2 Slope, a Singular Marker of Cervical Deformity, Correlates With Patient-reported Outcomes.
    Protopsaltis TS; Ramchandran S; Tishelman JC; Smith JS; Neuman BJ; Jr GMM; Lafage R; Klineberg EO; Hamilton DK; LaFage V; Gupta MC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Burton DC; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Feb; 45(3):184-192. PubMed ID: 31513111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of dynamic alignment, motion, and center of rotation on myelopathy grade and regional disability in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Liu S; Lafage R; Smith JS; Protopsaltis TS; Lafage VC; Challier V; Shaffrey CI; Radcliff K; Arnold PM; Chapman JR; Schwab FJ; Massicotte EM; Yoon ST; Fehlings MG; Ames CP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 26315953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement in some Ames-ISSG cervical deformity classification modifier grades may correlate with clinical improvement.
    Horn SR; Passias PG; Passfall L; Lafage R; Smith JS; Poorman GW; Steinmetz LM; Bortz CA; Segreto FA; Diebo B; Hart R; Burton D; Shaffrey CI; Sciubba DM; Klineberg EO; Protopsaltis TS; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Lafage V; Ames C;
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 89():297-304. PubMed ID: 34119284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical Versus Thoracolumbar Spinal Deformities: A Comparison of Baseline Quality-of-Life Burden.
    Passias PG; Poorman GW; Lafage V; Smith J; Ames C; Schwab F; Shaffrey C; Segreto FA; Horn SR; Bortz CA; Varlotta CG; Hockley A; Wang C; Daniels A; Neuman B; Hart R; Burton D; Javidan Y; Line B; LaFage R; Bess S; Sciubba D;
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Dec; 31(10):413-419. PubMed ID: 30371600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. At What Point Should the Thoracolumbar Region Be Addressed in Patients Undergoing Corrective Cervical Deformity Surgery?
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Naessig S; Ahmad W; Passfall L; Lafage R; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Daniels A; Eastlack R; Klineberg E; Line B; Mummaneni P; Hart R; Burton D; Bess S; Schwab F; Shaffrey C; Smith JS; Ames CP;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Oct; 46(20):E1113-E1118. PubMed ID: 34559752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system.
    Ames CP; Smith JS; Eastlack R; Blaskiewicz DJ; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Bess S; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Gupta M; O'Brien M; Hostin R; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis TS; Fu KM; Hart R; Albert TJ; Riew KD; Fehlings MG; Deviren V; Lafage V;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):673-83. PubMed ID: 26273762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of best versus worst clinical outcomes for adult spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of a prospectively collected, multicenter database with 2-year follow-up.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Schwab F; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis T; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Hostin R; Fu KM; Mundis GM; Kim HJ; Deviren V; Soroceanu A; Hart RA; Burton DC; Bess S; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 26047345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.