These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29191286)

  • 21. Reliability and minimal detectable change of spinal length and width measurements using the Flexicurve for usual standing posture in healthy young adults.
    Dunleavy K; Mariano H; Wiater T; Goldberg A
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2010; 23(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 21079300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Concordance and Reliability of Photogrammetric Protocols for Measuring the Cervical Lordosis Angle: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    de Albuquerque PMNM; de Alencar GG; de Oliveira DA; de Siqueira GR
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2018 Jan; 41(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 29366490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal Trends in Cervical Spine Curvature of South Korean Adults Assessed by Deep Learning System Segmentation, 2006-2018.
    Shin Y; Han K; Lee YH
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2020961. PubMed ID: 33057644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effective lordosis: analysis of sagittal spinal canal alignment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Gwinn DE; Iannotti CA; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 19951018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cervical sagittal alignment in adult hyperkyphosis treated by posterior instrumentation and in situ bending.
    Paternostre F; Charles YP; Sauleau EA; Steib JP
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 103(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27889355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of lumbar lordosis: inter-rater reliability, minimum detectable change and longitudinal variation.
    Hicks GE; George SZ; Nevitt MA; Cauley JA; Vogt MT
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Oct; 19(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 17021414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Betz JJ; Janik TJ; Holland B; Colloca CJ; Haas JW
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(3):139-51. PubMed ID: 12704306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after neck injury.
    Beltsios M; Savvidou O; Mitsiokapa EA; Mavrogenis AF; Kaspiris A; Efstathopoulos N; Papagelopoulos PJ
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():S47-51. PubMed ID: 23412281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of muscle energy techniques and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature in patients with mechanical neck pain: A pilot study.
    Osama M; Tassadaq N; Malik RJ
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Feb; 70(2):344-347. PubMed ID: 32063632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sagittal skin contour of the cervical spine: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability of the flexicurve instrument.
    Harrison DE; Haas JW; Harrison DD; Holland B; Janik T
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Sep; 28(7):516-9. PubMed ID: 16182026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical lordosis: the effect of age and gender.
    Been E; Shefi S; Soudack M
    Spine J; 2017 Jun; 17(6):880-888. PubMed ID: 28254673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
    Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The reliability, minimal detectable change and concurrent validity of a gravity-based bubble inclinometer and iphone application for measuring standing lumbar lordosis.
    Salamh PA; Kolber M
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2014 Jan; 30(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 23862655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Concurrent validity and reliability of telerehabilitation-based physiotherapy assessment of cervical spine in adults with non-specific neck pain.
    Mani S; Sharma S; Singh DK
    J Telemed Telecare; 2021 Feb; 27(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 31272309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system.
    Ames CP; Smith JS; Eastlack R; Blaskiewicz DJ; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Bess S; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Gupta M; O'Brien M; Hostin R; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis TS; Fu KM; Hart R; Albert TJ; Riew KD; Fehlings MG; Deviren V; Lafage V;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):673-83. PubMed ID: 26273762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An assessment of the most reliable method to estimate the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine: analysis of a prospective cohort of 138 cases.
    Donk RD; Fehlings MG; Verhagen WIM; Arnts H; Groenewoud H; Verbeek ALM; Bartels RHMA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):572-576. PubMed ID: 28291407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope in lumbar spinal stenosis: standard values and measurement accuracy.
    Bredow J; Oppermann J; Scheyerer MJ; Gundlfinger K; Neiss WF; Budde S; Floerkemeier T; Eysel P; Beyer F
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 May; 135(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 25750110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The accuracy of computerized biophotogrammetry in diagnosing changes in the cervical spine and its reliability for the cervical lordosis angle.
    de Albuquerque PMNM; de Oliveira DA; do Nascimento Alves LI; da Silva Alves Gomes VM; Bezerra LMR; de Souza Melo TM; de Alencar GG; da Silva Tenório A; de Siqueira GR
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2023; 36(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 35964169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The reliability and reproducibility of sagittal spinal curvature measurement using the Microsoft Kinect V2.
    Hannink E; Shannon T; Barker KL; Dawes H
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 31356192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.