270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29191317)
1. SeaNine 211 as antifouling biocide: A coastal pollutant of emerging concern.
Chen L; Lam JCW
J Environ Sci (China); 2017 Nov; 61():68-79. PubMed ID: 29191317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hepatic proteomic responses in marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) chronically exposed to antifouling compound butenolide [5-octylfuran-2(5H)-one] or 4,5-dichloro-2-N-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (DCOIT).
Chen L; Sun J; Zhang H; Au DW; Lam PK; Zhang W; Bajic VB; Qiu JW; Qian PY
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(3):1851-9. PubMed ID: 25555223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative safety of the antifouling compound butenolide and 4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (DCOIT) to the marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma).
Chen L; Ye R; Xu Y; Gao Z; Au DW; Qian PY
Aquat Toxicol; 2014 Apr; 149():116-25. PubMed ID: 24583292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chronic Exposure of Marine Medaka (Oryzias melastigma) to 4,5-Dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (DCOIT) Reveals Its Mechanism of Action in Endocrine Disruption via the Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Gonadal-Liver (HPGL) Axis.
Chen L; Zhang W; Ye R; Hu C; Wang Q; Seemann F; Au DW; Zhou B; Giesy JP; Qian PY
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4492-501. PubMed ID: 27035644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial analysis of 4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (Sea-Nine 211) concentrations and probabilistic risk to marine organisms in Hiroshima Bay, Japan.
Mochida K; Hano T; Onduka T; Ichihashi H; Amano H; Ito M; Ito K; Tanaka H; Fujii K
Environ Pollut; 2015 Sep; 204():233-40. PubMed ID: 25982549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proteomic changes in brain tissues of marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) after chronic exposure to two antifouling compounds: butenolide and 4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (DCOIT).
Chen L; Zhang H; Sun J; Wong YH; Han Z; Au DW; Bajic VB; Qian PY
Aquat Toxicol; 2014 Dec; 157():47-56. PubMed ID: 25456219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute Toxicity of a Novel anti-fouling Material Additive DCOIT to Marine Chlorella sp.
Ru JC; Zhao XL; Cao ZH; Chen CZ; Li P; Li ZH
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2022 Dec; 109(6):1018-1022. PubMed ID: 36318303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The environmental fate and effects of antifouling paint biocides.
Thomas KV; Brooks S
Biofouling; 2010 Jan; 26(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 20390558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Degradation kinetics of a potent antifouling agent, butenolide, under various environmental conditions.
Chen L; Xu Y; Wang W; Qian PY
Chemosphere; 2015 Jan; 119():1075-1083. PubMed ID: 25460745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antifouling processes and toxicity effects of antifouling paints on marine environment. A review.
Amara I; Miled W; Slama RB; Ladhari N
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jan; 57():115-130. PubMed ID: 29258017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Water quality criteria derivation and tiered ecological risk evaluation of antifouling biocides in marine environment.
Luo HW; Lin M; Bai XX; Xu B; Li M; Ding JJ; Hong WJ; Guo LH
Mar Pollut Bull; 2023 Feb; 187():114500. PubMed ID: 36586200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review: ecotoxicity of organic and organo-metallic antifouling co-biocides and implications for environmental hazard and risk assessments in aquatic ecosystems.
Martins SE; Fillmann G; Lillicrap A; Thomas KV
Biofouling; 2018 Jan; 34(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 29250978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First evaluation of the threat posed by antifouling biocides in the Southern Adriatic Sea.
Manzo S; Ansanelli G; Parrella L; Di Landa G; Massanisso P; Schiavo S; Minopoli C; Lanza B; Boggia R; Aleksi P; Tabaku A
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1981-93. PubMed ID: 24936527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of currently used marine antifouling paint biocides on green fluorescent proteins in Anemonia viridis.
Ünver B; Evingür GA; Çavaş L
J Fluoresc; 2022 Nov; 32(6):2087-2096. PubMed ID: 35917050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antifouling booster biocides in coastal waters of Panama: First appraisal in one of the busiest shipping zones.
Batista-Andrade JA; Caldas SS; de Oliveira Arias JL; Castro IB; Fillmann G; Primel EG
Mar Pollut Bull; 2016 Nov; 112(1-2):415-419. PubMed ID: 27496683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current and emerging environmentally-friendly systems for fouling control in the marine environment.
Gittens JE; Smith TJ; Suleiman R; Akid R
Biotechnol Adv; 2013 Dec; 31(8):1738-53. PubMed ID: 24051087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of species sensitivity distributions to predict no-effect concentrations of an antifouling biocide, pyridine triphenylborane, for marine organisms.
Mochida K; Onduka T; Amano H; Ito M; Ito K; Tanaka H; Fujii K
Mar Pollut Bull; 2012 Dec; 64(12):2807-14. PubMed ID: 23044030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risks of using antifouling biocides in aquaculture.
Guardiola FA; Cuesta A; Meseguer J; Esteban MA
Int J Mol Sci; 2012; 13(2):1541-1560. PubMed ID: 22408407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toxicity of 4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (DCOIT) in the marine decapod Litopenaeus vannamei.
Su Y; Li H; Xie J; Xu C; Dong Y; Han F; Qin JG; Chen L; Li E
Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():708-716. PubMed ID: 31108304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative toxicological effects of two antifouling biocides on the marine diatom Chaetoceros lorenzianus: Damage and post-exposure recovery.
Chavan P; Kumar R; Kirubagaran R; Venugopalan VP
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Oct; 144():97-106. PubMed ID: 28601522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
