These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29191409)

  • 1. Reducing the sensation of electrical stimulation with dry electrodes by using an array of constant current sources.
    Solomons CD; Slovak M; Heller B; Barker AT
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Jan; 51():91-95. PubMed ID: 29191409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the impedance of a thin hydrogel electrode on sensation during functional electrical stimulation.
    Sha N; Kenney LP; Heller BW; Barker AT; Howard D; Wang W
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jul; 30(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17942361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulating the Comfort of Textile Electrodes in Wearable Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.
    Zhou H; Lu Y; Chen W; Wu Z; Zou H; Krundel L; Li G
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):17241-57. PubMed ID: 26193273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nerve stimulation with an electrode of finite size: differences between constant current and constant voltage stimulation.
    Stecker MM
    Comput Biol Med; 2004 Jan; 34(1):51-94. PubMed ID: 14741729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of hydrogel as an electrode-skin interface for electrode array FES applications.
    Cooper G; Barker AT; Heller BW; Good T; Kenney LP; Howard D
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):967-72. PubMed ID: 21482167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 16-Channel biphasic current-mode programmable charge balanced neural stimulation.
    Li X; Zhong S; Morizio J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Aug; 16(1):104. PubMed ID: 28806960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current distribution under electrodes in relation to stimulation current and skin blood flow: are modern electrodes really providing the current distribution during stimulation we believe they are?
    Petrofsky J; Schwab E; Cúneo M; George J; Kim J; Almalty A; Lawson D; Johnson E; Remigo W
    J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(6):368-81. PubMed ID: 17060165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated setup of functional electrical stimulation for drop foot using a novel 64 channel prototype stimulator and electrode array: results from a gait-lab based study.
    Heller BW; Clarke AJ; Good TR; Healey TJ; Nair S; Pratt EJ; Reeves ML; van der Meulen JM; Barker AT
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Jan; 35(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 22559959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 100 electrode intracortical array: structural variability.
    Campbell PK; Jones KE; Normann RA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1990; 26():161-5. PubMed ID: 2334761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in perception and brain activation following stimulation by large versus small area cutaneous surface electrodes.
    Lelic D; Mørch CD; Hennings K; Andersen OK; Drewes AM
    Eur J Pain; 2012 Jul; 16(6):827-37. PubMed ID: 22337577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.
    Ambrus GG; Antal A; Paulus W
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 20980196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel surface electrode design for preferential activation of cutaneous nociceptors.
    Poulsen AH; van den Berg B; Arguissain F; Tigerholm J; Buitenweg JR; Andersen OK; Mørch CD
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 34996054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multi-channel stimulator and electrode array providing a rotating current whirlpool for electrical stimulation of wounds.
    Petrofsky J; Suh HJ; Fish A; Hernandez V; Abdo A; Collins K; Mendoza E; Yang TN
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 18821415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrode effectiveness during transcutaneous motor stimulation.
    Nelson HE; Smith MB; Bowman BR; Waters RL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1980 Feb; 61(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 7369842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical stimulation with a penetrating optic nerve electrode array elicits visuotopic cortical responses in cats.
    Lu Y; Yan Y; Chai X; Ren Q; Chen Y; Li L
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Jun; 10(3):036022. PubMed ID: 23665847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of concentric ring electrode electrical stimulation on rat skin.
    Besio W; Sharma V; Spaulding J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 38(3):1111-8. PubMed ID: 20087776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrical stimulation and electrode properties. Part 1: clinical electrodes.
    Stevenson M; Baylor K; Netherton BL; Stecker MM
    Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol; 2010 Sep; 50(3):171-86. PubMed ID: 20957973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects.
    Fertonani A; Ferrari C; Miniussi C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 126(11):2181-8. PubMed ID: 25922128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Array electrode design for transcutaneous electrical stimulation: a simulation study.
    Kuhn A; Keller T; Micera S; Morari M
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Oct; 31(8):945-51. PubMed ID: 19540788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.