183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29191609)
1. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study.
Schmidt A; Häussling T; Rehmann P; Schaaf H; Wöstmann B
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29191609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of implant system, impression technique, and impression material on accuracy of the working cast.
Wegner K; Weskott K; Zenginel M; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(4):989-95. PubMed ID: 23869356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory study.
Rutkunas V; Sveikata K; Savickas R
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):512-5. PubMed ID: 22930776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of impression material and time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant impressions.
Holst S; Blatz MB; Bergler M; Goellner M; Wichmann M
Quintessence Int; 2007 Jan; 38(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 17216911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
Buzayan M; Baig MR; Yunus N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy.
Akalin ZF; Ozkan YK; Ekerim A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 23377060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ozan O; Ozcelik TB; Yagiz A
J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of impression material accuracy in complete-arch restorations on four implants.
Baldissara P; Koci B; Messias AM; Meneghello R; Ghelli F; Gatto MR; Ciocca L
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):763-771. PubMed ID: 33526247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Selective Laser Melted Bar Retaining Mandibular Implant-Assisted Overdenture: An In Vitro Comparison of Different Impression Materials and Techniques.
El-Asfahani IA; Ramdan AS; Agamy EMTM
J Oral Implantol; 2023 Dec; 49(6):590-598. PubMed ID: 38279655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional accuracy of plastic transfer impression copings for three implant systems.
Teo JW; Tan KB; Nicholls JI; Wong KM; Uy J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 24818195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Study of Dimensional Accuracy in Three Dental Implant Impression Techniques: Open Tray, Closed Tray with Impression Coping, and Snap Cap.
Izadi A; Heidari B; Roshanaei G; Allahbakhshi H; Fotovat F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):974-981. PubMed ID: 30150500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital Evaluation of Trueness and Precision of Modern Impression Materials in Implant- Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
Ghanem RG; Badr AMI; Agamy EMTM; Eyüboğlu TF; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 May; 32(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 38691584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy of external- and internal-connection implants.
Mpikos P; Kafantaris N; Tortopidis D; Galanis C; Kaisarlis G; Koidis P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 23189292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
