These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29191609)

  • 41. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.
    Al-Bakri IA; Hussey D; Al-Omari WM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 17508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Three-dimensional Change of Elastomeric Impression Materials During the First 24 Hours: A Pilot Study.
    Roberts H
    Oper Dent; 2021 Nov; 46(6):E307-E316. PubMed ID: 34919709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
    Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of Accuracy Between a Conventional and Two Digital Intraoral Impression Techniques.
    Malik J; Rodriguez J; Weisbloom M; Petridis H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29518805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Restorations.
    Moura RV; Kojima AN; Saraceni CHC; Bassolli L; Balducci I; Özcan M; Mesquita AMM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e530-e535. PubMed ID: 29717518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of the three-dimensional correctness of impression techniques: a randomized controlled trial.
    Luthardt RG; Walter MH; Quaas S; Koch R; Rudolph H
    Quintessence Int; 2010; 41(10):845-53. PubMed ID: 20927421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ; Pesun IJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of accuracy of various impression techniques and impression materials in recording multiple implants placed unilaterally in a partially edentulous mandible- An
    Parameshwari G; Chittaranjan B; Sudhir N; Anulekha-Avinash CK; Taruna M; Ramureddy M
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Apr; 10(4):e388-e395. PubMed ID: 29750102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth.
    Giménez B; Özcan M; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):853-62. PubMed ID: 25032765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of Splinting on Dimensional Accuracy of Impressions Made of Implants with Different Subgingival Alignments.
    Beyabanaki E; Shamshiri AR; Alikhasi M; Monzavi A
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jan; 26(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 26436559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An implant impression technique using a plaster splinting index combined with a silicone impression.
    Eid N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15583565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
    Eliasson A; Ortorp A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accuracy of different impression materials in parallel and nonparallel implants.
    Vojdani M; Torabi K; Ansarifard E
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 26288620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.