These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29191685)

  • 21. Usefulness of MRI of microcalcification lesions to determine the indication for stereotactic mammotome biopsy.
    Kikuchi M; Tanino H; Kosaka Y; Sengoku N; Yamashita K; Minatani N; Nishimiya H; Waraya M; Katoh H; Enomoto T; Kajita S; Woodhams R; Watanabe M
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Nov; 34(11):6749-53. PubMed ID: 25368286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
    Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
    Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in probably benign (BI-RADS category 3) microcalcifications of the breast.
    Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Di Gaetano E; Dal Col A; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M
    Radiol Med; 2014 Jun; 119(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 24297595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
    Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.
    Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY
    BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications?
    Brnic D; Brnic D; Simundic I; Vanjaka Rogosic L; Tadic T
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 25995311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
    Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
    Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Occurrence and positive predictive value of additional nonmass findings for risk stratification of breast microcalcifications in mammography.
    Rominger MB; Sax EV; Figiel JH; Timmesfeld N
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Nov; 64(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 23298860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?
    Hoorntje LE; Peeters PH; Mali WP; Borel Rinkes IH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
    Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience with 249 patients].
    Travade A; Isnard A; Bagard C; Bouchet F; Chouzet S; Gaillot A; Vilmant R
    J Radiol; 2002 Sep; 83(9 Pt 1):1063-71. PubMed ID: 12223915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and Le Gal's classifications].
    Resende LM; Matias MA; Oliveira GM; Salles MA; Melo FH; Gobbi H
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2008 Feb; 30(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 19142479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
    Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
    Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
    Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.
    Kettritz U; Morack G; Decker T
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 16036159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method.
    Bae S; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(5):996-1005. PubMed ID: 26357494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study.
    Taskin F; Kalayci CB; Tuncbilek N; Soydemir E; Kurt N; Kaya H; Aribal E
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1718-1726. PubMed ID: 32939619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.