These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29192162)

  • 1. Environmental conditions limit attractiveness of a complex sexual signal in the túngara frog.
    Halfwerk W; Smit JAH; Loning H; Lea AM; Geipel I; Ellers J; Ryan MJ
    Nat Commun; 2017 Dec; 8(1):1891. PubMed ID: 29192162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Arginine vasotocin promotes calling behavior and call changes in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Davis ES; Marler CA
    Brain Behav Evol; 2007; 69(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 17299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multimodal cues improve prey localization under complex environmental conditions.
    Rhebergen F; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA; Halfwerk W
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Sep; 282(1814):. PubMed ID: 26336176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risks of multimodal signaling: bat predators attend to dynamic motion in frog sexual displays.
    Halfwerk W; Dixon MM; Ottens KJ; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA; Jones PL
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Sep; 217(Pt 17):3038-44. PubMed ID: 25165134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Ryan MJ; Rand AS; Marler CA
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2010 Jan; 165(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 19576218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of geographic heterogeneity in predation pressure on sexual signal divergence in an Amazonian frog species complex.
    Trillo PA; Athanas KA; Goldhill DH; Hoke KL; Funk WC
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23181745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal perception in frogs and bats and the evolution of mating signals.
    Akre KL; Farris HE; Lea AM; Page RA; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6043):751-2. PubMed ID: 21817052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ripple effects in a communication network: anti-eavesdropper defence elicits elaborated sexual signals in rival males.
    Leavell BC; Pantoja-Sánchez H; Vélez V; Hemingway CT; Wilhite K; Halfwerk W; Bernal XE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Dec; 290(2013):20231910. PubMed ID: 38113943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The vocal sac increases call rate in the Tungara frog Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Pauly GB; Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Physiol Biochem Zool; 2006; 79(4):708-19. PubMed ID: 16826497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. History influences signal recognition: neural network models of túngara frogs.
    Phelps SM; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Aug; 267(1453):1633-9. PubMed ID: 11467426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elastic structures in the vocalization apparatus of the Túngara frog Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae).
    Jaramillo C; Rand AS; Ibáñez R; Dudley R
    J Morphol; 1997 Sep; 233(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 9259126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Animal communication: complex call production in the túngara frog.
    Gridi-Papp M; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):38. PubMed ID: 16672962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female Preferences for More Elaborate Signals Are an Emergent Outcome of Male Chorusing Interactions in Túngara Frogs.
    Larter LC; Ryan MJ
    Am Nat; 2024 Jan; 203(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 38207138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multimodal signal variation in space and time: how important is matching a signal with its signaler?
    Taylor RC; Klein BA; Stein J; Ryan MJ
    J Exp Biol; 2011 Mar; 214(Pt 5):815-20. PubMed ID: 21307068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Covariation among multimodal components in the courtship display of the túngara frog.
    James LS; Halfwerk W; Hunter KL; Page RA; Taylor RC; Wilson PS; Ryan MJ
    J Exp Biol; 2021 Jun; 224(12):. PubMed ID: 34142696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid population divergence linked with co-variation between coloration and sexual display in strawberry poison frogs.
    Rudh A; Rogell B; Håstad O; Qvarnström A
    Evolution; 2011 May; 65(5):1271-82. PubMed ID: 21166789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived Synchrony of Frog Multimodal Signal Components Is Influenced by Content and Order.
    Taylor RC; Page RA; Klein BA; Ryan MJ; Hunter KL
    Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Oct; 57(4):902-909. PubMed ID: 28582535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.
    Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 276(1660):1323-9. PubMed ID: 19141428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Collateral damage or a shadow of safety? The effects of signalling heterospecific neighbours on the risks of parasitism and predation.
    Trillo PA; Bernal XE; Caldwell MS; Halfwerk WH; Wessel MO; Page RA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 May; 283(1831):. PubMed ID: 27194694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.