These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29192853)

  • 1. To P or Not to P: Backing Bayesian Statistics.
    Buchinsky FJ; Chadha NK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 157(6):915-918. PubMed ID: 29192853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inappropriate use of statistical power.
    Fraser RA
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2023 May; 58(5):474-477. PubMed ID: 36869191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests.
    Sanborn AN; Hills TT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 24101570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Living with p values: resurrecting a Bayesian perspective on frequentist statistics.
    Greenland S; Poole C
    Epidemiology; 2013 Jan; 24(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23232611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Détente: A Practical Understanding of P values and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities.
    Ruberg SJ
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2021 Jun; 109(6):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 32748400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):142. PubMed ID: 32503439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of Bayesian posterior significance and effect size indices for the two-sample t-test to support reproducible medical research.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):88. PubMed ID: 32321438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayes factor and posterior probability: Complementary statistical evidence to p-value.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Sep; 44():33-35. PubMed ID: 26212520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why checking model assumptions using null hypothesis significance tests does not suffice: A plea for plausibility.
    Tijmstra J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):548-559. PubMed ID: 29476482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size estimation in single-arm clinical trials with multiple testing under frequentist and Bayesian approaches.
    Zaslavsky BG; Scott J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):819-35. PubMed ID: 22651117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond 'statistical significance': A nontechnical primer of Bayesian statistics and Bayes factors for health researchers.
    Younas A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2024 Oct; 30(7):1218-1226. PubMed ID: 38825756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The researcher and the consultant: from testing to probability statements.
    Hamra GB; Stang A; Poole C
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 30(9):1003-8. PubMed ID: 26108655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision qualities of Bayes factor and p value-based hypothesis testing.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):340-360. PubMed ID: 28594227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian inference of population prevalence.
    Ince RA; Paton AT; Kay JW; Schyns PG
    Elife; 2021 Oct; 10():. PubMed ID: 34612811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian hypothesis testing in two-arm trials with dichotomous outcomes.
    Zaslavsky BG
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23002906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deciding on Null Hypotheses using P-values or Bayesian alternatives: A simulation study.
    Ruiz-Ruano García AM; López Puga J
    Psicothema; 2018 Feb; 30(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 29363479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian statistics for clinical research.
    Goligher EC; Heath A; Harhay MO
    Lancet; 2024 Sep; 404(10457):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 39277290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.
    Masson ME
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 21302025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.