201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29192965)
1. Trends in readmission rate by route of hysterectomy - a single-center experience.
Kreuninger JA; Cohen SL; Meurs EAIM; Cox M; Vitonis A; Jansen FW; Einarsson JI
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Mar; 97(3):285-293. PubMed ID: 29192965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of 30-day readmission following hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at a tertiary care academic medical center.
Lee MS; Venkatesh KK; Growdon WB; Ecker JL; York-Best CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):607.e1-607.e12. PubMed ID: 26704895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Timing of and Reasons for Unplanned 30-Day Readmission After Hysterectomy for Benign Disease.
Penn CA; Morgan DM; Rice LW; Harris JA; Rauh-Hain JA; Uppal S
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 128(4):889-897. PubMed ID: 27607868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.
Martino MA; Berger EA; McFetridge JT; Shubella J; Gosciniak G; Wejkszner T; Kainz GF; Patriarco J; Thomas MB; Boulay R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 24513969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hysterectomy for benign conditions: Complications relative to surgical approach and other variables that lead to post-operative readmission within 90 days of surgery.
Lonky NM; Mohan Y; Chiu VY; Park J; Kivnick S; Hong C; Hudson SM
Womens Health (Lond); 2017 Aug; 13(2):17-26. PubMed ID: 28660800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Perioperative Complications by Route of Hysterectomy Performed for Benign Conditions.
Rahimi S; Jeppson PC; Gattoc L; Westermann L; Cichowski S; Raker C; Weber LeBrun E; Sung V
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):364-8. PubMed ID: 27403755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.
Harris JA; Swenson CW; Uppal S; Kamdar N; Mahnert N; As-Sanie S; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):98.e1-98.e13. PubMed ID: 26314519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-hospital complications of vaginal versus laparoscopic-assisted benign hysterectomy among older women: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
Lai JC; Chen HH; Huang SM; Wang KL; Huang N; Hu HY; Chou YJ
Menopause; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27465711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trainee participation and perioperative complications in benign hysterectomy: the effect of route of surgery.
Barber EL; Harris B; Gehrig PA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):215.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26884272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?
Beck TL; Morse CB; Gray HJ; Goff BA; Urban RR; Liao JB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):348.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26470825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends and Perioperative Outcomes across Elective Benign Hysterectomy Procedures from the ACS-NSQIP 2007-2017.
Tyan P; Hawa N; Carey E; Urbina P; Chen FR; Sparks A; Amdur R; Moawad G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):365-374.e2. PubMed ID: 34610464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using international data to set benchmarks for morbidity outcomes after hysterectomy.
Pandit MJ; Alsop R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 133(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26797201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are perioperative bundles associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing benign hysterectomy? Retrospective cohort analysis of 16,286 cases in Michigan.
Harris JA; Sammarco AG; Swenson CW; Uppal S; Kamdar N; Campbell D; Evilsizer S; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):502.e1-502.e11. PubMed ID: 28082214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rate of Urologic Injury with Robotic Hysterectomy.
Petersen SS; Doe S; Rubinfeld I; Davydova Y; Buekers T; Sangha R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):867-871. PubMed ID: 29337210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy: Do perioperative outcomes differ? A propensity score-matched analysis.
Rademaker D; Einarsson JI; Huirne JAF; Gu X; Cohen SL
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1040-1045. PubMed ID: 30793762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
