184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29193060)
21. Manipulating the behavior-altering effect of the motivating operation: examination of the influence on challenging behavior during leisure activities.
O'Reilly MF; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Rispoli M; Lang R; Chan J; Machalicek W; Langthorne P
Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 17629672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.
DeLeon IG; Chase JA; Frank-Crawford MA; Carreau-Webster AB; Triggs MM; Bullock CE; Jennett HK
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 24782203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Peer presence and the emergence of conditioned reinforcement from observation.
Singer-Dudek J; Oblak M
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 24114222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Establishing books as conditioned reinforcers for preschool children as a function of an observational intervention.
Singer-Dudek J; Oblak M; Greer RD
J Appl Behav Anal; 2011; 44(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 21941376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Parametric analysis of presession exposure to edible and nonedible stimuli.
Sy JR; Borrero JC
J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(4):833-7. PubMed ID: 20514190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Establishing tokens as conditioned reinforcers with long-stay psychiatric patients.
Samuels GI; Black WA
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1974 Sep; 8(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 4531911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The conditioning of textual responses using "extrinsic" reinforcers.
STAATS AW; STAATS CK; SCHUTZ RE; WOLF M
J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Jan; 5(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 13916029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Immediate and delayed reinforcement on WISC-R performance for mentally retarded students.
Young RM; Bradley-Johnson S; Johnson CM
Appl Res Ment Retard; 1982; 3(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 7103469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nucleus accumbens neurons in the rat exhibit differential activity to conditioned reinforcers and primary reinforcers within a second-order schedule of saccharin reinforcement.
Wilson DI; Bowman EM
Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(10):2777-88. PubMed ID: 15548221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of reinforcement schedules in the reduction of stereotypy with supported routines.
Saunders MD; Saunders RR; Marquis JG
Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(2):99-122. PubMed ID: 9547523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.
Francisco MT; Borrero JC; Sy JR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 18595283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An analysis of the value of token reinforcement using a multiple-schedule assessment.
Fiske KE; Isenhower RW; Bamond MJ; Lauderdale-Littin S
J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jan; 53(1):563-571. PubMed ID: 31329284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.
Kenzer AL; Bishop MR; Wilke AE; Tarbox JR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 24114234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.
DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Conners J; Wallace MD
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 10201108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.
Fahmie TA; Iwata BA; Jann KE
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):331-43. PubMed ID: 25891170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An evaluation of resistance to change with unconditioned and conditioned reinforcers.
Vargo KK; Ringdahl JE
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):643-62. PubMed ID: 26119287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.
Kodak T; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Kisamore A
Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 19327964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.
Zarcone JR; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 8682741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context.
Foster TA; Hackenberg TD
J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):5-25. PubMed ID: 15113130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
