These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29193060)

  • 41. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
    Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.
    Ciccone FJ; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 25754896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using a self-control training procedure to increase appropriate behavior.
    Dixon MR; Hayes LJ; Binder LM; Manthey S; Sigman C; Zdanowski DM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 9652100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Token reinforcement during the instatement and shaping of fluency in the treatment of stuttering.
    Howie PM; Woods CL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1982; 15(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 7096230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of a lag schedule of reinforcement in a group contingency to promote varied naming of categories items with children.
    Wiskow KM; Donaldson JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):472-84. PubMed ID: 27174183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Using self-stimulation as reinforcement for autistic children.
    Hung DW
    J Autism Child Schizophr; 1978 Sep; 8(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 690069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Risky choice in pigeons: preference for amount variability using a token-reinforcement system.
    Lagorio CH; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Sep; 98(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 23008519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items.
    McAdam DB; Klatt KP; Koffarnus M; Dicesare A; Solberg K; Welch C; Murphy S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 15898479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Response-cost punishment with pigeons: further evidence of response suppression via token loss.
    Raiff BR; Bullock CE; Hackenberg TD
    Learn Behav; 2008 Feb; 36(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 18318424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluating the influence of postsession reinforcement on choice of reinforcers.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Call N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(3):515-27. PubMed ID: 17970264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Differential effects of four token conditions on rate and choice of responding in a matching-to-sample task.
    Repp AC; Klett SZ; Sosebee LH; Speir NC
    Am J Ment Defic; 1975 Jul; 80(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 1180264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
    Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Response acquisition with intermittent immediate and delayed conditioned reinforcement.
    Bermúdez K; Bruner CA; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Mar; 99(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 23355101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Second-order stimuli do not always increase overall response rates in second-order schedules of reinforcement in the rat.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jul; 174(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 15083254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Motivational influences on performance maintained by food reinforcement.
    North ST; Iwata BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 16270842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Response rates and choices of schizophrenics under fixed-ratio contingencies of reinforcement.
    Weiner H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Dec; 51(3 Pt 2):1239-43. PubMed ID: 7220225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Using token reinforcement to increase walking for adults with intellectual disabilities.
    Krentz H; Miltenberger R; Valbuena D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Dec; 49(4):745-750. PubMed ID: 27287667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.
    Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):269-89. PubMed ID: 20885815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessing the value of choice in a token system.
    Sran SK; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(3):553-7. PubMed ID: 21358919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.