These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29193079)
1. Statistical Modeling of the Case Information From the Ohio Attorney General's Sexual Assault Kit Testing Initiative. Kerka JE; Heckman DJ; Albert JH; Sprague JE; Maddox LO J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1122-1133. PubMed ID: 29193079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Decision Tree and Logistic Regression Models for Utilization in Sexual Assault Kit Processing. Wentzlof CA; Kerka JE; Albert JH; Sprague JE; Maddox LO J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):528-533. PubMed ID: 30290398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to Right a Wrong: Empirically Evaluating Whether Victim, Offender, and Assault Characteristics can Inform Rape Kit Testing Policies. Goodman-Williams R; Campbell R; Sharma DB; Pierce SJ; Feeney H; Fehler-Cabral G J Trauma Dissociation; 2019; 20(3):288-303. PubMed ID: 31072268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The case for "investigate all": Assessing the cost-effectiveness of investigating no CODIS hit cases in a sexual assault kit initiative. Lovell RE; Singer M; Flannery DJ; McGuire MJ J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1316-1328. PubMed ID: 33650102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forgotten evidence: A mixed methods study of why sexual assault kits (SAKs) are not submitted for DNA forensic testing. Campbell R; Fehler-Cabral G; Bybee D; Shaw J Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):454-467. PubMed ID: 28661168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The problem of untested sexual assault kits: why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory? Patterson D; Campbell R J Interpers Violence; 2012 Jul; 27(11):2259-75. PubMed ID: 22258072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A State Census of Unsubmitted Sexual Assault Kits: Comparing Forensic DNA Testing Outcomes by Geographic and Population Density Characteristics. Campbell R; Javorka M; Sharma DB; Gregory K; Opsommer M; Schelling K; Lu L J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1820-1827. PubMed ID: 32866311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tested at Last: How DNA Evidence in Untested Rape Kits Can Identify Offenders and Serial Sexual Assaults. Campbell R; Feeney H; Pierce SJ; Sharma DB; Fehler-Cabral G J Interpers Violence; 2018 Dec; 33(24):3792-3814. PubMed ID: 27021733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analyzing Approaches to the Backlog of Untested Sexual Assault Kits in the U.S.A. Wang C; Wein LM J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1110-1121. PubMed ID: 29505678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a Victim-Centered, Trauma-Informed Victim Notification Protocol for Untested Sexual Assault Kits (SAKs). Campbell R; Shaw J; Fehler-Cabral G Violence Against Women; 2018 Mar; 24(4):379-400. PubMed ID: 29332557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Legislation Mandating DNA Testing in Sexual Assault Cases: Results in Texas. Davis RC; Auchter B; Wells W; Camp T; Howley S Violence Against Women; 2020 Apr; 26(5):417-437. PubMed ID: 30971179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing Standard and Selective Degradation DNA Extraction Methods: Results from a Field Experiment with Sexual Assault Kits. Campbell R; Pierce SJ; Sharma DB; Shaw J; Feeney H; Nye J; Schelling K; Fehler-Cabral G J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):213-222. PubMed ID: 27885653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the number of samples to collect and test from a sexual assault. Wang Z; MacMillan K; Powell M; Wein LM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(24):13421-13427. PubMed ID: 32482858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "It Made Me Feel Like Someone Wasn't Doing Their Job:" Sexual Assault Kit (SAK) Victim Notifications and Institutional Betrayal by the Criminal Legal System. Campbell R; Engleton J; Gregory K; Goodman-Williams R; Javorka M J Trauma Dissociation; 2024; 25(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 37401798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting sexual assault kit submission among adolescent rape cases treated in forensic nurse examiner programs. Shaw J; Campbell R J Interpers Violence; 2013 Dec; 28(18):3400-17. PubMed ID: 24097906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of direct PCR and Rapid DNA approaches to streamline sexual assault kit testing. Harrel M; Holmes AS J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1336-1347. PubMed ID: 35442526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Justice Denied: Low Submission Rates of Sexual Assault Kits and the Predicting Variables. Valentine JL; Sekula LK; Cook LJ; Campbell R; Colbert A; Weedn VW J Interpers Violence; 2019 Sep; 34(17):3547-3573. PubMed ID: 29294625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changing the Criminal Justice System Response to Sexual Assault: An Empirical Study of a Participatory Action Research Project. Campbell R; Fehler-Cabral G; Pierce SJ; Sharma DB; Shaw J; Horsford S; Feeney H Am J Community Psychol; 2021 Mar; 67(1-2):166-178. PubMed ID: 32511777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eligible offender samples are missing in CODIS: A statewide approach to performing a lawfully owed DNA census. Salinas OC J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1758-1770. PubMed ID: 38922865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The National Problem of Untested Sexual Assault Kits (SAKs): Scope, Causes, and Future Directions for Research, Policy, and Practice. Campbell R; Feeney H; Fehler-Cabral G; Shaw J; Horsford S Trauma Violence Abuse; 2017 Oct; 18(4):363-376. PubMed ID: 26698602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]