These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29193415)

  • 1. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (I): Theory, method, and phantom experiments.
    van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Vos FM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1190-1196. PubMed ID: 29193415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (II): Applications in spine diagnostics and assessment of crohn's disease.
    van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Kramer G; Pieters-van den Bos I; Marcus JT; Stoker J; Vos FM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 29193469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI by fitting the signal in the complex plane.
    Simonis FF; Sbrizzi A; Beld E; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1236-45. PubMed ID: 26525012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal resolution improvement of calibration-free dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with compressed sensing optimized turbo spin echo: The effects of replacing turbo factor with compressed sensing accelerations.
    Han S; Cho H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):138-47. PubMed ID: 26713414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of blood inflow and B(1)-field inhomogeneity on measurement of the arterial input function in axial 3D spoiled gradient echo dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Roberts C; Little R; Watson Y; Zhao S; Buckley DL; Parker GJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Jan; 65(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20928889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blind deconvolution estimation of an arterial input function for small animal DCE-MRI.
    Jiřík R; Taxt T; Macíček O; Bartoš M; Kratochvíla J; Souček K; Dražanová E; Krátká L; Hampl A; Starčuk Z
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():46-56. PubMed ID: 31150814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.
    Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model.
    He D; Xu L; Qian W; Clarke J; Fan X
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518. PubMed ID: 29569210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceleration techniques and their impact on arterial input function sampling: Non-accelerated versus view-sharing and compressed sensing sequences.
    Benz MR; Bongartz G; Froehlich JM; Winkel D; Boll DT; Heye T
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():8-13. PubMed ID: 29857871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
    Mehrabian H; Chandrana C; Pang I; Chopra R; Martel AL
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1735-47. PubMed ID: 22752523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
    Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indirect MRI of
    Kudo K; Harada T; Kameda H; Uwano I; Yamashita F; Higuchi S; Yoshioka K; Sasaki M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 28861934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of computational fluid dynamics in the design of dynamic contrast enhanced imaging phantoms.
    Hariharan P; Freed M; Myers MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6369-91. PubMed ID: 23999605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
    Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification.
    Kellman P; Hansen MS; Nielles-Vallespin S; Nickander J; Themudo R; Ugander M; Xue H
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Apr; 19(1):43. PubMed ID: 28385161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of inflow and radiofrequency spoiling on the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a combined phantom and simulation study.
    Garpebring A; Wirestam R; Ostlund N; Karlsson M
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Jun; 65(6):1670-9. PubMed ID: 21305599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro pharmacokinetic phantom for two-compartment modeling in DCE-MRI.
    Wahyulaksana G; Saporito S; den Boer JA; Herold IHF; Mischi M
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(20):205012. PubMed ID: 30238927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phantom Validation of DCE-MRI Magnitude and Phase-Based Vascular Input Function Measurements.
    Foltz W; Driscoll B; Laurence Lee S; Nayak K; Nallapareddy N; Fatemi A; Ménard C; Coolens C; Chung C
    Tomography; 2019 Mar; 5(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 30854445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of saturation-recovery dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition protocol: monte carlo simulation approach demonstrated with gadolinium MR renography.
    Zhang JL; Conlin CC; Carlston K; Xie L; Kim D; Morrell G; Morton K; Lee VS
    NMR Biomed; 2016 Jul; 29(7):969-77. PubMed ID: 27200499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.