These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29194056)

  • 41. A comparison of nurse attitudes before implementation and 6 and 18 months after implementation of an electronic health record.
    Laramee AS; Bosek M; Shaner-McRae H; Powers-Phaneuf T
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Oct; 30(10):521-30. PubMed ID: 22584880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A research protocol for testing relationships between nurse workload, missed nursing care and neonatal outcomes: the neonatal nursing care quality study.
    Tubbs-Cooley HL; Pickler RH; Mark BA; Carle AC
    J Adv Nurs; 2015 Mar; 71(3):632-41. PubMed ID: 25354486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care.
    Menon S; Murphy DR; Singh H; Meyer AN; Sittig DF
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(2):543-59. PubMed ID: 27437060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using social knowledge networking technology to enable meaningful use of electronic health record technology in hospitals and health systems.
    Rangachari P
    J Hosp Adm; 2014 Dec; 3(6):66-78. PubMed ID: 29201263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Statewide Study to Assess Nurses' Experiences With Meaningful Use-Based Electronic Health Records.
    McBride S; Tietze M; Hanley MA; Thomas L
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2017 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 27655332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Measuring Nurses' Experiences With Unintended Adverse Consequences in EMR Use in Acute Care Settings.
    Lee S
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2021 Jul; 39(11):747-754. PubMed ID: 34238833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Nurses' perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: a qualitative study.
    Stevenson JE; Nilsson G
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Mar; 68(3):667-76. PubMed ID: 21781148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Use of Electronic Health Records by Nurses for Symptom Management in Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Ozkaynak M; Reeder B; Hoffecker L; Makic MB; Sousa K
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2017 Sep; 35(9):465-472. PubMed ID: 28240616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The patient perception of the nurse-patient relationship when nurses utilize an electronic health record within a hospital setting.
    Strauss B
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2013 Dec; 31(12):596-604. PubMed ID: 24365972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of Electronic Medical Records on Nurses' Time Allocation During Cesarean Delivery.
    Tan M; Lipman S; Lee H; Sie L; Carvalho B
    J Patient Saf; 2019 Dec; 15(4):e82-e85. PubMed ID: 29485519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Persisting workarounds in Electronic Health Record System use: types, risks and benefits.
    Boonstra A; Jonker TL; van Offenbeek MAG; Vos JFJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Jun; 21(1):183. PubMed ID: 34103041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Nurse Practitioner Perceptions of the Impact of Electronic Medical Records Upon Clinical Practice.
    Borycki EM; Sangster-Gormley E; Schreiber R; Feddema A; Griffith J; Swamy M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 218():45-51. PubMed ID: 26262525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Survey of the Literature on Unintended Consequences Associated with Health Information Technology: 2014-2015.
    Zheng K; Abraham J; Novak LL; Reynolds TL; Gettinger A
    Yearb Med Inform; 2016 Nov; (1):13-29. PubMed ID: 27830227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey.
    Menon S; Singh H; Meyer AN; Belmont E; Sittig DF
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2014; 34(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 25070253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Unintended consequences of the electronic health record and cognitive load in emergency department nurses.
    Harmon CS; Adams SA; Davis JE; Gephart SM; Donevant SB
    Appl Nurs Res; 2023 Oct; 73():151724. PubMed ID: 37722792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Nurse's use of power to standardise nursing terminology in electronic health records.
    Ali S; Sieloff CL
    J Nurs Manag; 2017 Jul; 25(5):346-353. PubMed ID: 28371031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Determinants of primary care nurses' intention to adopt an electronic health record in their clinical practice.
    Leblanc G; Gagnon MP; Sanderson D
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Sep; 30(9):496-502. PubMed ID: 22592453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Applying Computational Ethnography to Examine Nurses' Workflow Within Electronic Health Records.
    Tolentino DA; Subbian V; Gephart SM
    Nurs Res; 2021 Mar-Apr 01; 70(2):132-141. PubMed ID: 33630536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The electronic medical record: pros and cons.
    Ventura ML; Battan AM; Zorloni C; Abbiati L; Colombo M; Farina S; Tagliabue P
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Oct; 24 Suppl 1():163-6. PubMed ID: 21942617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications.
    Bowman S
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2013; 10(Fall):1c. PubMed ID: 24159271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.