These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29194129)

  • 1. Peer Review: The Science of Nursing Education Depends on It.
    Patterson BJ
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(2):75. PubMed ID: 29194129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Garbage in, garbage out.
    Brink PJ
    West J Nurs Res; 1999 Dec; 21(6):725-7. PubMed ID: 11512209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contemporary landscape of journal publishing.
    McKenna L
    Collegian; 2016; 23(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 27188033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific integrity and the journal review process.
    Becker PT
    Res Nurs Health; 1998 Aug; 21(4):283-4. PubMed ID: 9679805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can you believe what you read?
    Woods A
    Nurs Manage; 2003 Aug; 34(8):4. PubMed ID: 12888721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing.
    Katz A
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guidelines for writing journal articles in English.
    Suh MH
    Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2004 Jun; 34(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 15502425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open peer review: a first step.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2004; 53(4):213. PubMed ID: 15266157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
    Kennedy MS
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weighing up research.
    Joseph S
    Nurs Stand; 2009 Mar 18-24; 23(28):61. PubMed ID: 19400372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. International Research for School Nursing: Implications for Reviewers.
    Cowell JM
    J Sch Nurs; 2017 Dec; 33(6):413-414. PubMed ID: 29108498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predatory Journals: A Potential Threat to Nursing Practice and Science.
    Bourgault AM
    Crit Care Nurse; 2019 Aug; 39(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 31371362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Journal reviewers and reviews: should the system be revised?
    Birchenall PD; Parrish AA
    Br J Nurs; 2003 Jul 10-23; 12(13):773. PubMed ID: 12920453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics: Predatory Publishing: Keeping the Wolves from Your Office Door.
    Merkle Sorrell J; Owens JK
    Online J Issues Nurs; 2015 Aug; 20(3):9. PubMed ID: 26882518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.