BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29194272)

  • 1. Comparison of Complication Rate Between LeFort III and Monobloc Advancement With or Without Distraction Osteogenesis.
    Knackstedt R; Bassiri Gharb B; Papay F; Rampazzo A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):144-148. PubMed ID: 29194272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Rare Orbital Complication of Eye Exodeviation With Limited Abduction During Monobloc Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis.
    Hariri F; Cheung LK; Rahman ZA; Ramasamy SN; Ganesan D
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Jul; 52(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 25007030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions.
    Gosain AK; Santoro TD; Havlik RJ; Cohen SR; Holmes RE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 May; 109(6):1797-808. PubMed ID: 11994576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New trends in cranio-orbital and midface distraction for craniofacial dysostosis.
    Hopper RA
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Aug; 20(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 22894998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distraction osteogenesis in the surgical management of syndromic craniosynostosis: a comprehensive review of published papers.
    Al-Namnam NMN; Hariri F; Rahman ZAA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 56(5):353-366. PubMed ID: 29661509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative outcomes and management in midface advancement surgery: a multicenter observational descriptive study from the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group.
    Glover CD; Fernandez AM; Huang H; Derderian C; Binstock W; Reid R; Dalesio NM; Zhong J; Stricker PA;
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2018 Aug; 28(8):710-718. PubMed ID: 29920872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of perioperative morbidity after LeFort III and monobloc distraction osteogenesis.
    Meling TR; Høgevold HE; Due-Tønnessen BJ; Skjelbred P
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 20226576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meningoencephalocele and other dural disruptions: complications of Le Fort III midfacial osteotomies and distraction.
    Ridgway EB; Robson CD; Padwa BL; Goumnerova LC; Mulliken JB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):182-6. PubMed ID: 21233755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LeFort III Versus Monobloc Frontofacial Advancement: A Comparative Analysis of Soft Tissue Changes.
    Wagner CS; Cho DY; Villavisanis DF; Kumar S; Salinero LK; Barrero CE; Swanson JW; Bartlett SP; Taylor JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 35(1):194-198. PubMed ID: 37934807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Respiratory outcome of midface advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.
    Mathijssen I; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Mireau E; Morisseau-Durand MP; Guérin P; Renier D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 17(4):642-4. PubMed ID: 16877907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fronto-orbital advancement with simultaneous LeFort III-distraction.
    Kubler AC; Speder B; Zoller JE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Oct; 32(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 15458670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lefort II distraction with zygomatic repositioning versus Lefort III distraction: A comparison of surgical outcomes and complications.
    Purnell CA; Evans M; Massenburg BB; Kim S; Preston K; Kapadia H; Hopper RA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct; 49(10):905-913. PubMed ID: 33965326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monobloc advancement by distraction osteogenesis decreases morbidity and relapse.
    Bradley JP; Gabbay JS; Taub PJ; Heller JB; O'Hara CM; Benhaim P; Kawamoto HK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Dec; 118(7):1585-1597. PubMed ID: 17102732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term stability of LeFort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device in a patient with Crouzon syndrome.
    Kuroda S; Watanabe K; Ishimoto K; Nakanishi H; Moriyama K; Tanaka E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):550-61. PubMed ID: 21967944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Additional orthognathic surgery following Le Fort III and monobloc advancement.
    Nout E; Koudstaal MJ; Wolvius EB; Van der Wal KG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):679-84. PubMed ID: 21398092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mid-face distraction after LeFort III osteotomy in craniofacial dysmorphism].
    Weingart D; Roser M; Lantos P
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2001 Jul; 5(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 11550604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monobloc Distraction and Facial Bipartition Distraction with External Devices.
    Dunaway DJ; Budden C; Ong J; James G; Jeelani NUO
    Clin Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 48(3):507-519. PubMed ID: 34051902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis in syndromal craniosynostosis.
    Meling TR; Hans-Erik H; Per S; Due-Tonnessen BJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 16432404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monobloc Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis for Correction of Severe Fronto-orbital and Midface Hypoplasia in Pediatric Crouzon Syndrome.
    Hariri F; Cheung LK; Rahman ZA; Mathaneswaran V; Ganesan D
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 25650655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.