These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29194638)

  • 41. Pigeons learn to answer the question "where did you just peck?" and can report peck location when unexpectedly asked.
    Singer RA; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 17918424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Choice between single and multiple reinforcers in concurrent-chains schedules.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 17002228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Learn Behav; 2019 Sep; 47(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 31011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A model for discriminating reinforcers in time and space.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jun; 127():62-73. PubMed ID: 27016156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements.
    Fantino E; Herrnstein RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jan; 11(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 5636860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Matching: its acquisition and generalization.
    Crowley MA; Donahoe JW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 15540502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 31804106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Short-term remembering of discriminative stimuli in pigeons.
    Jans JE; Catania AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Sep; 34(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 7411014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.
    Nevin JA; Davison M; Odum AL; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Sep; 88(2):285-317. PubMed ID: 17970420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Concurrent schedules: discriminating reinforcer-ratio reversals at a fixed time after the previous reinforcer.
    Cowie S; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 23943395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Escape from rich-to-lean transitions: Stimulus change and timeout.
    Retzlaff BJ; Parthum ET; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):65-84. PubMed ID: 28078744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.
    McMillan DE; Hardwick WC; Li M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jan; 77(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 11831785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency.
    Ward RD; Odum AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Nov; 90(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 19070338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Experience with dynamic reinforcement rates decreases resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 26813330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A further study of stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.
    THOMAS DR; WILLIAMS JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Apr; 6(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 13981054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Multiple schedules, off-baseline reinforcement shifts, and resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):148-163. PubMed ID: 29293265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.