BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29194902)

  • 1. Metastatic prostate cancer incidence in Australia after amendment to prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines.
    Smith S; Wolanski P
    ANZ J Surg; 2018; 88(7-8):E589-E593. PubMed ID: 29194902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.
    Gejerman G; Ciccone P; Goldstein M; Lanteri V; Schlecker B; Sanzone J; Esposito M; Rome S; Ciccone M; Margolis E; Simon R; Guo Y; Pentakota SR; Sadeghi-Nejad H
    Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Nov; 58(6):423-428. PubMed ID: 29124241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Past, Current, and Future Incidence Rates and Burden of Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the United States.
    Kelly SP; Anderson WF; Rosenberg PS; Cook MB
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jan; 4(1):121-127. PubMed ID: 29162421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force statement on prostate-specific antigen screening: analysis of urologic and primary care practices.
    Perez TY; Danzig MR; Ghandour RA; Badani KK; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
    Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 25440819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against prostate specific antigen screening on prostate biopsy and cancer detection rates.
    Bhindi B; Mamdani M; Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Hamilton RJ; Trachtenberg J; Zlotta AR; Evans A; van der Kwast TH; Toi A; Fleshner NE
    J Urol; 2015 May; 193(5):1519-24. PubMed ID: 25481037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials and Revised PSA Screening Guidelines on Rates of Prostate Biopsy and Postbiopsy Complications.
    Gershman B; Van Houten HK; Herrin J; Moreira DM; Kim SP; Shah ND; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jan; 71(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 26995328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation against Screening for Prostate Cancer on Incident Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in the United States.
    Barocas DA; Mallin K; Graves AJ; Penson DF; Palis B; Winchester DP; Chang SS
    J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1587-93. PubMed ID: 26087383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate cancer incidence across stage, NCCN risk groups, and age before and after USPSTF Grade D recommendations against prostate-specific antigen screening in 2012.
    Butler SS; Muralidhar V; Zhao SG; Sanford NN; Franco I; Fullerton ZH; Chavez J; D'Amico AV; Feng FY; Rebbeck TR; Nguyen PL; Mahal BA
    Cancer; 2020 Feb; 126(4):717-724. PubMed ID: 31794057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate Needle Biopsy Outcomes in the Era of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation against Prostate Specific Antigen Based Screening.
    Banerji JS; Wolff EM; Massman JD; Odem-Davis K; Porter CR; Corman JM
    J Urol; 2016 Jan; 195(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 26254722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PSA screening, prostate biopsy, and treatment of prostate cancer in the years surrounding the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening.
    Kearns JT; Holt SK; Wright JL; Lin DW; Lange PH; Gore JL
    Cancer; 2018 Jul; 124(13):2733-2739. PubMed ID: 29781117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishing the pathways and indications for performing isotope bone scans in newly diagnosed intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer - results from a large contemporaneous cohort.
    KandaSwamy GV; Bennett A; Narahari K; Hughes O; Rees J; Kynaston H
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5B):E59-E63. PubMed ID: 28317247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increase in the Annual Rate of Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Contemporary Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database.
    Bandini M; Mazzone E; Preisser F; Nazzani S; Zaffuto E; Marchioni M; Tian Z; Pompe RS; Tilki D; Graefen M; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Saad F; Briganti A; Karakiewicz P
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):314-320. PubMed ID: 31100253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes observed in prostate biopsy practices in an inner city hospital with a high risk patient population following the 2012 uspstf psa screening recommendations.
    Tam AW; Khusid J; Inoyatov I; Becerra AZ; Davila J; Chouhan JD; Weiss JP; Hyacinthe LM; McNeil BK; Winer AG
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 29617073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in the outcome of prostate biopsies after preventive task force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.
    Zakaria AS; Dragomir A; Brimo F; Kassouf W; Tanguay S; Aprikian A
    BMC Urol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 30126402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force 'D' recommendation on prostate cancer screening and staging.
    Eapen RS; Herlemann A; Washington SL; Cooperberg MR
    Curr Opin Urol; 2017 May; 27(3):205-209. PubMed ID: 28221220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends for Stage and Grade Group of Prostate Cancer in the US (2010-2016).
    Schmanke K; Okut H; Ablah E
    Urology; 2021 Mar; 149():110-116. PubMed ID: 33227304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice.
    Gaylis FD; Choi JE; Hamilton Z; Dato P; Cohen E; Calabrese R; Prime H; Rosenbaum A; Kader AK
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):663.e1-663.e7. PubMed ID: 28736250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term consequences of the USPSTF Grade D recommendation for prostate-specific antigen screening.
    Joshi SS; Filson CP
    Cancer; 2020 Feb; 126(4):694-696. PubMed ID: 31794066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the 2012 and 2018 US preventive services task force prostate cancer screening guidelines on pathologic outcomes after prostatectomy.
    Plambeck BD; Wang LL; Mcgirr S; Jiang J; Van Leeuwen BJ; Lagrange CA; Boyle SL
    Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 34807485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPTSTF) recommendations against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing on PSA testing in Australia.
    Zargar H; van den Bergh R; Moon D; Lawrentschuk N; Costello A; Murphy D
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 27454454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.