195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29195427)
21. Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration.
Guérit F; Santurette S; Chalupper J; Dau T
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
Yang HI; Zeng FG
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. When singing with cochlear implants, are two ears worse than one for perilingually/postlingually deaf individuals?
Aronoff JM; Kirchner A; Abbs E; Harmon B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL503. PubMed ID: 29960471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness.
Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3164. PubMed ID: 28599571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site.
Stahl P; Macherey O; Meunier S; Roman S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1578. PubMed ID: 27106306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contralateral suppression of human hearing sensitivity in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Nogueira W; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lopez-Poveda E
Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():121-129. PubMed ID: 29941311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Speech rate, rate-matching, and intelligibility in early-implanted cochlear implant users.
Freeman V; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1043. PubMed ID: 28863583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Vickers D; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Undurraga J
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():74-87. PubMed ID: 30031354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perceptual Differences Between Low-Frequency Analog and Pulsatile Stimulation as Shown by Single- and Multidimensional Scaling.
Stupak N; Padilla M; Morse RP; Landsberger DM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807535. PubMed ID: 30378468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Matching the pitch perception of the cochlear implanted ear with the contralateral ear in patients with single-sided deafness: a novel approach.
Tóth TF; Németh A; Bakó P; Révész P; Gerlinger I; Szanyi I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Nov; 280(11):4851-4859. PubMed ID: 37133499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.
Camarena A; Goldsworthy RL
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109026. PubMed ID: 38776706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tone perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.
Li G; Soli SD; Zheng Y
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S49-S59. PubMed ID: 28532185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sequential stream segregation in normally-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
Tejani VD; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Chatterjee M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):50. PubMed ID: 28147600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.
Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Liao S; Becker JJ; Lakin CE; Warren FM; McMenomey SO
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e23-34. PubMed ID: 25319401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Factors influencing electrical place pitch perception in bimodal listeners.
Plant KL; McDermott HJ; van Hoesel RJ; Dawson PW; Cowan RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1199. PubMed ID: 25190394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contour identification with pitch and loudness cues using cochlear implants.
Luo X; Masterson ME; Wu CC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):EL8-14. PubMed ID: 24437857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
